The New Mexico Supreme Court took the state GOP’s side Monday in a dispute with New Mexico election officials over how broadly to expand mail-in voting for the state’s upcoming elections due to the pandemic.
The court issued its order after a two-hour-plus hearing, conducted over Zoom, the Las Cruces Sun News reported.
Twenty-seven local clerks — with the backing of New Mexico Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver (D) — had sought the court’s permission to essentially transform New Mexico’s June 2 election into an entirely mail-in election (though in-person voting would be available to those who needed it).
Their lawyers told the court on Monday, according to Las Cruces Sun News, that the overhaul could not be done legislatively because calling a special session would require under law that legislators physically gather. They said they were merely asking the court to interpret existing election code rather than change the law, which already allows for special elections to be conducted via mail.
Their request was initially filed unopposed, but the New Mexico Republican party, with the support of a voter fraud alarmist group, filed a lawsuit to block the request. The GOP claims that mail-in voting system the Democratic officials were seeking to implement — in which every registered voter receives a ballot in the mail — was susceptible to fraud.
The Republicans instead backed a system in line with New Mexico’s current absentee voting practices, where voters must apply for mail-in ballots before the ballots are sent to them. The court backed the approach, according to Las Cruces Sun News, while adding that it would order clerks to mail the ballot applications to all voters.
The court fight was one of several playing out across the country as voter advocates and election officials grapple with how to protect voters in the pandemic. Only a handful of states already have the infrastructure in place to smoothly administer elections largely done by mail.
If NM has an absentee ballot system, start filing for one today for the November election. No excuses.
It’s worked well in WI and needs to go national.
Don’t let the GOP disenfranchise you - they can’t win if you vote.
Most current info I could find suggests that there are 5 judges, 4 democrats and 1 republican. So not typical GOP voter ratfuckery, I guess, other than the GOP filing an objection?
This is the opportunity for our former billionaire Democratic candidates to really put their money where their mouths are…
This was an excellent strategy in WI.
More detail from yesterday’s Albuquerque Journal