NYT Faces Backlash For Headline On How ‘We’ Missed Rise Of Right-Wing Extremism

The New York Times faced a wave of backlash Thursday morning after announcing in a headline that “We” missed “The Rise of Right-Wing Extremism.”

The headline, for the Thursday episode of the Times’ “The Daily” podcast, was eventually changed: “The Rise of Right-Wing Extremism, and How U.S. Law Enforcement Ignored It”

But readers and journalists saw the initial headline as representative of a narrow view of “we” — and pointed out that marginalized groups in America and scores of reporters on the ground have long warned of violent right-wing extremists.

 

54
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Just the fact Tim Allen has a career is evidence enough we’re in the midst of a fascism plague.

  2. “The Rise of Right-Wing Extremism, and How U.S. Law Enforcement Ignored It”

  3. These guys probably wear butterflies, Tweedjackets with leatherpatches and smokes pipes with real tobacco ?

    I’m glad they stopped my subscription, at the time were they tried the free subscription model.

    and just because it’s the NYT I will repost this

    Londoners troll New York Times with deluge of ‘petty crimes’
    An appeal for victims of petty crime in the UK’s capital has been met with sarcasm
    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/dec/13/londoners-troll-new-york-times-petty-crimes6

  4. No. Seriously. How DID the NYT miss it? It was obvious to anyone, whether they were looking for it or not! The NYT and most of the “mainstream media” chose to view it all through it’s “both sides” sort of lens.

    Fuck the NYT. Hope they rot in hell.

  5. The NYT missed the rise of Conservative Extremism because they’re contemptuous of every one who warns them, and they dismiss as a leftist partisan everyone who tells them what’s happening, even when the people ringing the sirens are columnists in their own house - like Paul Krugman and Charles Blow.

    NYT’s reporters, editors, and publishers have been so intent on proving to the right-wing that they were unbiased, centrist, and neutral, that they let themselves get turned into a both-sides justification tool for the right.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

48 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for romath Avatar for jaligard Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for scottsa Avatar for crackerjack Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for inversion Avatar for psudawnc Avatar for johnbarleycorn Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for martinstett Avatar for nemo Avatar for keninmn Avatar for jcblues Avatar for civik Avatar for georgeh Avatar for tiowally Avatar for jills Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for spin Avatar for godwit

Continue Discussion