Groups Seek NY Constitutional Right To Clean Air, Water

FILE - In this Jan. 21, 2016 file photo, the Hoosic River runs through the village of Hoosick Falls, N.Y. New York regulators say Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics and Honeywell International are required to pay for ... FILE - In this Jan. 21, 2016 file photo, the Hoosic River runs through the village of Hoosick Falls, N.Y. New York regulators say Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics and Honeywell International are required to pay for the investigation and cleanup of a toxic chemical in the upstate village’s drinking water. (AP Photo/Mike Groll, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Environmental and public policy groups in New York are calling for a state constitutional amendment that would guarantee residents a right to clean air and water.

Environmental Advocates of New York and EffectiveNY are promoting the proposed amendment with online video ads Thursday featuring children from Hoosick Falls, where water wells have been contaminated by an industrial chemical.

“You shouldn’t have to fight for clean water,” says 15-year-old Mikayla Baker, a Hoosick Falls ninth-grader featured in one of the two videos.

The groups say a constitutional amendment would give residents more power to hold state lawmakers and regulators accountable for ensuring a healthy environment.

Six states have environmental rights provisions in their constitutions. A 1971 Environmental Rights Amendment to Pennsylvania’s constitution was the basis for a state Supreme Court ruling in 2013 that said municipalities have a right to zone against shale gas development. Drilling in the underground shale has resulted in public health and environmental concerns.

In Hoosick Falls, special filters were installed on public and private wells contaminated with the industrial chemical PFOA that has been linked to cancer and other illness. Residents there have accused the administration of Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo of being too slow to launch an investigation and warn people after the contamination came to light in 2014.

At a state Senate hearing in August, Health Commissioner Howard Zucker said the state followed federal guidelines in addressing the issue.

“In 2016, we saw communities in New York struggling with clean drinking water and clean air,” Environmental Advocates executive director Peter Iwanowicz said. “What was missing was clear language in the state constitution giving people the right to drink water that won’t make them sick and breathe air that’s safe.”

State regulators also drew criticism this year from community residents and environmental groups for their handling of air permits for oil terminals at the Port of Albany. As a result, the Department of Environmental Conservation in September said it will require an extensive new review of permits originally issued in 2012 that turned Albany into a major hub for crude oil rail shipments from North Dakota.

“Constitutional protection means that even if a state agency or the Legislature does the wrong thing through regulation or statute, people have the ability to use our courts to get us to do the right thing,” said Democratic state Sen. Liz Krueger, a potential sponsor of the amendment when it’s drafted.

Residents now have the right to bring lawsuits challenging environmental laws or regulations, but a constitutional amendment would give stronger weight to their arguments, Iwanowicz said.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
6
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. This is a great idea. Unfortunately, having a constitutional right doesn’t necessarily mean much in practice. Think of the Equal Protection Clause.

  2. It’s a beginning. And I hope we can hope it’s a good sign.

  3. One would think this is a no-brainer and it is: the no-brained GOP will block any attempt to keep air and water from being monetized.

  4. And Flint. Apparently the majority of voters at most state levels prefer a demagogue who promises less EPA regulation- jobs that pollute air and water- and more jobs to the candidate who promises and delivers jobs that are EPA-regulated to lessen pollution. Why else would state legislatures and governorships be GOP-controlled by a margin of 2-1?

  5. In part, because of the failure of Democrats to build grass-roots structures, which led to Republican majorities in many states in 2010, which led to gerrymandering through redistricting. And Democrats have not shown that they have learned from history.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for chuck_voellinger Avatar for 26degreesrising

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: