New Report Undermines Trumpworld Defense On Ukraine Quid Pro Quo

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney answers questions during a briefing at the White House October 17, 2019 in Washington, DC. Mulvaney answered a range of questions relating to the issues surrounding the... Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney answers questions during a briefing at the White House October 17, 2019 in Washington, DC. Mulvaney answered a range of questions relating to the issues surrounding the impeachment inquiry of U.S. President Donald Trump, and other issues during the briefing. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Ukrainian government was made aware just a few days after the country’s President spoke with President Donald Trump on the phone that military aid was being held up purposefully, The New York Times reported Wednesday.

The new revelation undermines a defense that Trump supporters grasped hold of in the hours after Ambassador Bill Taylor’s bombshell testimony Tuesday: It couldn’t be a quid pro quo if Ukraine wasn’t aware security assistance was being withheld.

A Pentagon official reportedly discussed the issue directly with a Ukrainian official, the Times said.

The report cited interviews and documents the Times had obtained. The Ukrainians were made aware that the aid freeze was “not a bureaucratic glitch,” in the paper’s words, but rather a problem that ought to be addressed with White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.

The White House has pointed to the timeline of Ukraine’s supposed awareness about missing military aid as a defense against charges of a “quid pro quo” by Trump. If Ukraine wasn’t aware that military money was being withheld, the argument goes, how could they have felt pressure to investigate Trump’s political rivals? Trump tweeted such an argument on Wednesday.

The Pentagon announced in June that Ukraine would receive a nine-figure assistance package from the U.S., but months ticked by without that money reaching Ukraine. The country is currently engaged in a years-long war with Russia.

An Aug. 28 Politico article revealed the White House’s hold on the aid. But the Times reported that the Ukrainians actually knew in the first week of August that the money was being purposefully withheld.

Per the Times, an unnamed Pentagon official discussed the freeze with an unnamed Ukrainian official in early August. The Pentagon official urged the Ukrainian to reach out to Mulvaney, who the Pentagon official said had been pushing for the aid to be withheld, the Times said.

The anonymous whistleblower whose complaint kicked off the House’s impeachment inquiry also mentioned an “early August” awareness from the Ukrainians, the Times noted. “As of early August, I heard from U.S. officials that some Ukrainian officials were aware that U.S. aid might be in jeopardy,” the whistleblower wrote.

The Pentagon official also reportedly made clear that Andriy Yermak, an aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, should reach out to Mulvaney, the Times said.

On July 25, just before Trump pressed Zelensky in a phone call to investigate Trump’s political rivals, the then-U.S. Special Envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker texted Yermak.

“[A]ssuming President Z convinces trump he will investigate / ‘get to the bottom of what happened’ in 2016, we will nail down date for visit to Washington,” Volker texted, referring to a meeting with Trump in that Zelensky wanted.

A few days later, on Aug. 2, Giuliani met with Yermak in Spain.

In September, U.S. ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland reportedly told Yermak that “the security assistance money would not come until President Zelensky committed to pursue the Burisma investigation,” according to written testimony Tuesday from Taylor.

Mulvaney “had absolutely no communication with the Ukranians about this issue,” an unnamed administration source told the Times.

Latest News
41
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for gregor gregor says:

    The Ukrainegate will go unpunished unless someone finds a blue dress.

    Come to think of it, there was a hooker in plain sight but nothing happened to the criminal.

    So take all these revelations coming at the speed of light with a grain of salt.

    Republicans will never go against Trump - not the Senators not the Congressman not the blue collar workers of Ohio not the suburban wives not the old white men in suits not the Federalist boys not the Koch brothers. Nancy Pelosi is looking for a unicorn in her quest for a bipartisan consensus on impeachment. That ain’t gonna happen.

    All these yet some more incriminating pieces of news get our hopes up, but somehow Republicans seem invincible. The WMD lies. The torture memos. The US Attorneys purge. The Mueller report. And now this.

    Don’t get me wrong. I would be ecstatic if finally something happens. But the history in this context is a bitch. Why this is so is very mysterious.

    All this is very entertaining of course.

  2. yeah…Mulvaney was working through Rudy, Sondland, Perry, and Volker.

  3. They really need to get their story straight.
    LOL

  4. Well that flimsy defense didn’t last long, not that they wont keep using it anyways.

  5. It all falls apart because it is hard to keep all the lies straight. I just want Trump gone.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

35 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for daled Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for musgrove Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for pine Avatar for slimjim33 Avatar for southerndem Avatar for docd Avatar for rickjones Avatar for woland66 Avatar for erik_t Avatar for gregor Avatar for pinkie Avatar for gilgamesh Avatar for paul_lukasiak Avatar for ameliababy Avatar for rockitttla Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for Akimbo Avatar for JorgeP

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: