NBC: CIA General Counsel Thought She Made Criminal Referral Based On Whistleblower Info

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 27: In this photo illustration, a copy of the unclassified memorandum of U.S. President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky from July 25, 2019 is shown ... WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 27: In this photo illustration, a copy of the unclassified memorandum of U.S. President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky from July 25, 2019 is shown September 27, 2019 in Washington, DC. The White House released on September 25, 2019 a memorandum of the phone call, one day after Speaker of the House Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced a formal impeachment inquiry due to a whistleblower complaint regarding the call. (Photo Illustration by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The CIA’s general counsel made a criminal referral — or at least, she thought she did — of a whistleblower’s complaint concerning President Donald Trump’s interactions with Ukraine’s president.

According to NBC News, which cited unnamed officials familiar with the matter, Courtney Simmons Elwood, the CIA’s top lawyer, considered her Aug. 14 phone call with high-ranking DOJ officials to be a criminal referral. 

However, unnamed Justice Department officials told NBC News they didn’t consider the conversation to be a formal criminal referral — because it wasn’t in writing.

John Eisenberg, the top legal adviser to the National Security Council, and John Demers, chief of the Justice Department’s National Security Division, were reportedly on the call.

Elwood and Eisenberg told Demers on that call that “the allegations merited examination by the DOJ,” in NBC News’ words.

Attorney General Bill Barr was made aware of the conversation in the days that followed, NBC News reported.

The newly reported referral is different from a later referral of the whistleblower’s allegations to the Justice Department by the director of national intelligence and the inspector general for the intelligence community. The Justice Department declined to pursue the case.

The Justice Department has acknowledged that it did not open a criminal investigation based on that referral because, “based on the facts and applicable law, that there was no campaign finance violation and that no further action was warranted,” a spokesperson said.

Latest News
145
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. And next the argument, when referral is submitted in writing , that double jeopardy applies. case closed

  2. Avatar for ur ur says:

    Criminal referral? I don’t see no criminal referral. Hey Billy, do you see a criminal referral? Naw, I don’t see no criminal referral. Sorry, babe, no criminal referral here, now run along…

  3. When is a criminal referral not a criminal referral? When Bill Barr is on the receiving end.

  4. Well when your boss’ name is all over the complaint…recusal time time for Barr?

  5. Please keep repeating. It is ILLEGAL to solicit or accept political campaign assistance from a foreign entity! Impeach and convict the motherfucking ilegal.

    All he had to do was “follow the law.”

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

139 more replies

Participants

Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for jackster Avatar for cervantes Avatar for voreason Avatar for irasdad Avatar for sniffit Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for 26degreesrising Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for topchap Avatar for darrtown Avatar for junebug Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for blogamator Avatar for jtx Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for machoneman Avatar for spin Avatar for justruss Avatar for carriewhitacre Avatar for holywah Avatar for dicktater Avatar for kovie

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: