NPS Acting Director Offers Nuanced Take On Decision To Keep Confederate Monuments

MOOSE, WYOMING - JUNE 17: David Vela, Superintendent of Grand Teton National Park stands for a portrait in Grand Teton National Park on June 17, 2016 in Moose, Wyoming. The National Park Service is celebrating its centennial after it was established through the National Park Service Organic Act on August 25, 1916. Photo by Ann Hermes/The Christian Science Monitor
MOOSE, WYOMING - JUNE 17: David Vela, Superintendent of Grand Teton National Park stands for a portrait in Grand Teton National Park on June 17, 2016 in Moose, Wyoming. The National Park Service is celebrating its ce... MOOSE, WYOMING - JUNE 17: David Vela, Superintendent of Grand Teton National Park stands for a portrait in Grand Teton National Park on June 17, 2016 in Moose, Wyoming. The National Park Service is celebrating its centennial after it was established through the National Park Service Organic Act on August 25, 1916. (Photo by Ann Hermes/The Christian Science Monitor via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

National Park Service acting director David Vela on Wednesday discussed the complexities of dealing with racism associated with parks as the movement to remove Confederate monuments gains momentum nationwide.

During an interview that aired on ABC News Wednesday, Vela acknowledged the history of racism in parks and explained that the NPS is working on developing “a different approach” to combat it. Vela, who is the first Latino to lead the agency after being appointed by President Trump in 2017, said that part of the solution is to have an open discussion about racism and using park programming to reflect on “challenging times” in history.

“I think that as a person of color, I think that our national parks and what I’ve found, is opportunities to really reflect on the most difficult and challenging times in our nation’s history,” Vela said.

When asked about the growing movement to remove monuments linked to racism that emerged during protests in the wake of George Floyd’s death, Vela said that “there’s no question that the vast majority of the protests and demonstrations have been peaceful,” but that it’s “painful” to see the defacement of statues and memorials on park land.

However, Vela offered a nuanced take on the NPS’ position against removing statues or memorials paying tribute to Confederate figures, arguing that removal would risk removing “the stories that they contain.”

“I’ve had conversations even today about the position of the Park Service is that we’re not tearing down, removing any statue or memorial,” Vela said. “If we do that on park land, we then remove the stories that they contain. And if those stories are further sanitized in the history text, we may completely lose that narrative. We can’t.”

Vela added that the role of the Park Service is to foster discussion if a statue or memorial in a national park is offensive to visitors.

“Let’s talk about who put it up, why they put it up. The context, the lens that they used in putting it up, and then give you more information,” Vela said. “And then when you leave that visitor experience, you decide, visitor, what do you do with it?”

Vela said that he hopes visitors will “want to learn more and do further research” with this approach.

“And if that’s the case, we did our job,” Vela said. “But we’re not going to make that decision for you. But we’re going to give you the information that we have through our interpretive and educational processes.”

Watch Vela’s remarks below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Hes a coward and using “as a person of color” shield is offensive. He doesn’t seem to understand his service is a custodian for ALL Americans.

  2. “Let’s talk about who put it up, why they put it up. The context, the lens that they used in putting it up, and then give you more information,” Vela said. “And then when you leave that visitor experience, you decide, visitor, what do you do with it?”

    Okay…and what if we learn and find out it was put up to intimidate and terrorize a portion of the local population? What if we, the visitors, decide we want to tear it down anyway?

  3. Vela said that “there’s no question that the vast majority of the protests and demonstrations have been peaceful,” but that it’s “painful” to see the defacement of statues and memorials on park land.

    What about the pain felt by the victims of the hatred symbolized by these statues?

  4. I have no problem with what acting Director Vela is saying, but that shouldn’t protect the statues that were erected in places that are not National Parks or Monuments.

  5. Disagree, I he is trying say that statues in federal parks are there so that rangers can put them into context. I have no problem with this.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

293 more replies

Participants

Avatar for bdtex Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for deuce Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for cervantes Avatar for rhea Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for topchap Avatar for schmed Avatar for tribalogical Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for gopalb Avatar for pareedave Avatar for susanintheoc Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for justruss Avatar for phlogiston Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for paul_lukasiak Avatar for JR_in_Mass

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: