National Guard Taps Units To Respond To Potential Civil Unrest

FILE - In this June 1, 2020, file photo, District of Columbia National Guard, and U.S. Park Police, advance through the white roses in front of the AFL-CIO headquarters, with St. John's Church behind them, as they mo... FILE - In this June 1, 2020, file photo, District of Columbia National Guard, and U.S. Park Police, advance through the white roses in front of the AFL-CIO headquarters, with St. John's Church behind them, as they move demonstrators back after they gathered to protest the death of George Floyd near the White House in Washington. The National Guard has designated military police units in two states to serve as rapid reaction forces in order to be better prepared to respond quickly to civil unrest around the country, in the wake of the violent protests that rocked the nation’s capitol and several states this summer. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The National Guard has designated military police units in two states to serve as rapid reaction forces so they can respond quickly to any potential civil unrest around the country, following violent protests that rocked the nation’s capital and several states this summer.

Military leaders don’t explicitly tie the changes to concerns about possible election-related violence, but the nation is bracing for unrest surrounding the tumultuous presidential campaign, particularly if voting results are not known for days or weeks because of the increase in mail-in ballots.

According to the Guard, about 600 troops — 300 in both Alabama and Arizona — will be ready to deploy within 24 hours if requested by a governor in another state. And Guard leaders have also bought more than $200,000 in new protective equipment, and have increased troop training on proper procedures in dealing with protests.

The moves come as Defense Department and National Guard leaders work to address shortfalls that were identified in the military response to the June protests triggered by the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis. Military reviews of the response to the protests found problems with coordination between various state and federal government and law enforcement agencies — which at times slowed down troop movements.

“Coordination and communication were the probably the things that we’ll look back on and see very challenging,” Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said in an interview with The Associated Press. He said that as the protests escalated in D.C., and the call for help went out to governors around the country, 11 states said they were willing to provide support.

“But the problem with that is how quickly can you marshal them together, ensure they have the appropriate training, ensure they have the appropriate equipment, understand the task you’re going to give them?” said McCarthy. “It’s American streets. It could turn violent. It was an incredibly challenging thing.”

Governors can use National Guard troops for a variety of things, ranging from natural disasters such as hurricanes and wildfires, to assisting with border security and civil unrest. If a governor needs additional help, they can request troops from other state governors through a compact agreement system that details how the forces will be used and what they can and cannot do.

Lt. Gen. Mark Sasseville, vice chief of the National Guard Bureau, said the Guard employs a graduated approach, with states using their own troops first, and then, if more help is needed, they request forces from other states within their region. If more support is needed, then governors reach out to states further away.

“That makes sense because typically the states have good relations with the neighboring states,” said Sasseville in an interview with The Associated Press. “Speed becomes an element of this discussion.”

The problem, however, is that some states couldn’t free up troops to send to others because they also were dealing with protests or other emergencies. The Guard’s decision to formally designate troops in Alabama and Arizona as quick reaction forces will help because those units have aircraft that will allow them to rapidly deploy to another state within 24 hours of a governor’s request.

Guard officials said the forces in Alabama would respond in the eastern half of the country, and those in Arizona would respond in the west, and their deployment window at this point extends through the end of this year.

“A big thing that we’ve done differently is being able to move faster,” said Sasseville, adding that the Guard also had to buy equipment to replace protective gear for some units.

Military police from the Arizona National Guard were mobilized at least twice this year in support of law enforcement, including to Wisconsin and in response to protests in Phoenix in the wake of Floyd’s death.

During the June protests, governors used their own Guard troops and, in some cases sought and received forces from other states. At the peak, in early June, there were more than 43,000 Guard forces deployed across 34 states and the District of Colombia to help with civil unrest. That number has now plunged to about 3,200 across 10 states.

In extreme cases, the president can invoke the Insurrection Act and use active duty troops on domestic soil to quell riots or assist law enforcement. President Donald Trump pushed for that to happen, but senior defense and military leaders opposed it.

During the June protests, Defense Secretary Mark Esper drew the ire of the president when he told reporters that the Insurrection Act should be invoked in the United States “only in the most urgent and dire of situations.” He added, “We are not in one of those situations now.”

___

Associated Press writer Paul Davenport in Phoenix contributed to this report.

Latest News
27
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Follow the money. Who profits from that “$200,000 in new protective equipment”? And whose idea was this? Scaring people about possible violent protest is Trump’s election theme, not Biden’s. Watch to see if Trump says anything about this.

  2. I may be wrong but why this? If you keep prepping for something and fearing it you’re probably motivating it. Who’s going to be doing this “unrest”? A bunch of over the hill, overweight nobodys with self image issues. Adult men playing dress up with AR-15’s and Made in China “tactical webbing” bought in the surplus store. These guys are not going to “stand” as we called it in the Army. They’re all about the talk…not the walk. There’s not going to be a civil war, revolution or boogaloo. These guys don’t have the metal for that.

  3. I hope this doesn’t mean that the National Guard will be joining with vigilante right-wing terrorists in attacking protesters if the fascists attempt to steal the presidency from actual voters.

    We’re already having problems with trumpers disrupting peaceful voters here in NM and we’re a blue state with Democrats in control of state government. We’ve already seen the Albuquerque police welcoming right-wing terrorist assistance (but not for long).

  4. And on November 4th their mission will change from “defending against civil unrest” to “safeguarding uncounted ballots due to multiple reports of election fraud.”

    (copied from other thread)

  5. I think you’re probably right and I certainly hope you’re right. But with the actions of tRumpers in TX, and even here in NM I don’t expect them to take the defeat of their earthly idol well.

    I just want to see law enforcement go after the actual perpetrators of violence if it comes to that.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

21 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for tcinla Avatar for arrendis Avatar for tomanjeri Avatar for lastroth Avatar for gr Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for tena Avatar for tiowally Avatar for jmacaz Avatar for canyoncountry Avatar for agnesbee Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for n_b Avatar for enceladus

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: