Nadler Blasts ‘Outrageous’ White House Rejection Of House Obstruction Probe

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 08: House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) (C) reacts to news that President Donald Trump will invoke executive privilege before a mark-up hearing where members may vote to hold... WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 08: House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) (C) reacts to news that President Donald Trump will invoke executive privilege before a mark-up hearing where members may vote to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill May 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. Just moments before Wednesday's hearing, Trump announced that he will invoke executive privilege over all the materials Nadler subpoenaed, including an unredacted copy of special prosecutor Robert Mueller's report and its underlying evidence. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) called the White House’s sweeping rejection of his committee’s requests related to whether President Trump obstructed justice “outrageous” while speaking to reporters Wednesday afternoon.

“The White House is making the outrageous claim that a president cannot be held accountable in anyway to the American people, ” he said.”They say the Justice Department cannot hold him accountable since a sitting president can’t be indicted, and now they’re saying Congress cannot hold a president accountable. This is ridiculous — it would make the president above the law and of course we totally reject it.”

The White House on Wednesday swatted away the House Judiciary Committee’s requests for documents and interviews with witnesses related to potential obstruction by President Trump. The White House argued that Congress’ effort is “duplicative” of special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe.

Nadler seemed frustrated, but unmoved by the letter, vowing to hold in contempt “whoever doesn’t comply with subpoenas.”

Latest News
49
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Outrageous Obstruction of Original Orange Obstruction…

    O my…

    Time to start locking them up…

  2. I think the time for furrowed brows and deep concerns has past.
    Lock them up.

  3. I’ll bet if you locked up two or three people the floodgates would open regarding documents and testimony.

  4. Can’t trade punches. Impeach 'em.

    All of 'em…

  5. Arrest them, impeach them, whatever.

    Just Do It.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

43 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for brainpicnic Avatar for economides Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for stoy Avatar for sharksbreath Avatar for hquain Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for vlharpley Avatar for schmed Avatar for rocklaverve Avatar for bodie1 Avatar for choska Avatar for 1american Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for perfectmoment Avatar for fuashcroft Avatar for maximus Avatar for aiddon Avatar for dominic Avatar for carolson Avatar for lanabill Avatar for c_stedman Avatar for emiliano4

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: