Murkowski Condemns Mulvaney’s Remarks, Few Other GOPers Speak Up

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) walks to the Senate subway after a vote in the Senate on June 18, 2019. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/GettyImages)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

You’d barely know, from the reaction of congressional Republicans, that White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney had publicly confirmed a central question of House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry on national television.

Mulvaney said in a press conference Thursday that the White House had withheld military funds appropriated by Congress for Ukraine over Donald Trump’s insistence that Ukraine investigate a conspiracy theory about Democrats and the 2016 election.

The strongest Republican voice in reaction to Mulvaney was Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK).

“You don’t hold up foreign aid that we had previously appropriated for a political initiative, period,” Murkowski told reporters, calling the news of Mulvaney’s comment “absolutely a concern.”

Rep. Francis Rooney (R-FL) told CNN Thursday that Mulvaney’s comments acknowledging the White House had withheld aid were “troubling.” The congressman, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, ran for Congress in 2016 as a business-savvy Trump supporter, advertising his support for Trump’s border wall.

In an interview on-air Friday, Rooney told CNN that Mulvaney had made the issue “clear.”

“Whatever might have been gray and unclear before is certainly quite clear right now, that the actions were related to getting the Ukraine to do some of these things,” he said. Rooney said Murkowski had framed the issue perfectly: “We’re not supposed to use government power and prestige for political gain.”

Rooney wouldn’t rule out supporting impeachment.

“The only unknown would be if this is so grave and serious that it rises to the level of impeachment,” he said. “I don’t think this is as much as Richard Nixon did, but I’m very mindful of the fact that back during Watergate, everybody said, ‘Oh, it’s a witch hunt to get Nixon.’ Turns out it wasn’t a witch hunt, it was absolutely correct.”

“So I just want to make sure that I get all the data I can get,” he said. “And I’m talking to everybody I can talk to to understand all this.

Appearing on CNN earlier Friday, Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), a sometimes-critic of the administration’s handling of the impeachment inquiry, also expressed alarm about Mulvaney’s remarks.

“It’s quite concerning and I think we’re going to get more information as we’re seeing this happen rapidly,” he said.

But Kinzinger said the comments has not lead him to support impeachment. He said he needed more information.

“I have no idea why he said what he said,” Kinzinger said of Mulvaney, noting that the chief of staff had attempted to take back his comments after making them. “Was he talking about just general corruption, or was he talking specifically about the Biden issue?”

“It depends what the purpose is on it,” he added. “So, a lot of concern in all of this. I think we’re going to hear a lot more probably very soon.”

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. A bunch of Republican chicken shits trying to butter their bread on both sides by being “troubled” but not sure it warrants impeachment. They all need “more information”. What a brave and principled stand!

    I suppose this is what you call progress in politics. They all make Amash look like some kind of superhero.

  2. “The only unknown would be if this is so grave and serious that it rises to the level of impeachment,” he said. “I don’t think this is as much as Richard Nixon did, but I’m very mindful of the fact that back during Watergate, everybody said, ‘Oh, it’s a witch hunt to get Nixon.’ Turns out it wasn’t a witch hunt, it was absolutely correct.”

    No surprise that Rooney skips lightly over the Clinton impeachment.

  3. “The only unknown would be if this is so grave and serious that it rises to the level of impeachment,” [Rooney] said.

    The real question is “WTF does it take?”

  4. Has anyone asked Susan Collins if she too is “concerned”? I mean, I’m happy for any cracks that appear in the GOP facade, but this is pathetic.

  5. “I have no idea why he said what he said,” Kinzinger said of Mulvaney

    Because he forgot to use his inner monologue.

    image

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

197 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for jcs Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for cervantes Avatar for inversion Avatar for dont Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for drriddle Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for emjayay Avatar for lastroth Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for kelaine Avatar for justruss Avatar for philmore Avatar for gilgamesh Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for kovie Avatar for Bri2k

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: