A few days after attempting to clean up his “worst briefing” comment regarding the Trump administration’s briefing on the strike that killed top Iranian military official Qasem Soleimani last week, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) seems to have added to the mess.
On Friday, President Trump said that he was justified in authorizing the strike that killed Soleimani because he had been planning attacks on four U.S. embassies — a claim that is at odds with senior officials in his administration.
During an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper Sunday morning, Lee reiterated how “we didn’t receive very much information that wasn’t already available through public media sources.”
“This is one of the things that’s very frustrating,” Lee said. “When something like this happens, when events are unfolding quickly, events that will have a profound impact on national security and military strategy, Congress does need to know about it, in part so we can evaluate the scope of our authority to act or choose not to act. We didn’t get that. And that was disappointing.”
When Tapper asked Lee whether Trump’s claim that there was a threat against four U.S. embassies was brought up during last week’s briefing, Lee said he “didn’t hear anything about that” and that “several of my colleagues have said the same.”
“So, that was news to me. It certainly wasn’t something that I recall being raised in the classified briefing,” Lee said. “Well, look, I’m not sure exactly what he’s trying to say there. I don’t recall being told, look, there were four embassies. I’m sure there was a mention of at least one embassy in that briefing, because there had been an attack on one of our embassies in the days leading up to General Soleimani’s killing.”
Lee was then quick to bring up his talking point of issuing “a statement within a few hours of the attack on General Soleimani” that “was a good development from the standpoint of the security of the American people” because Americans are “safer as a result of the fact that he’s dead.”
When pressed by Tapper about whether he believes Soleimani posed an “imminent” threat, which Trump administration officials have said regarding what prompted the strike that killed the top Iranian military official, Lee dodged the question and appeared to place more blame on the briefers.
“Look, I have not yet been able to ascertain really specific details as to the imminence of the attack. Again, we weren’t provided that the other day. We were given somewhat general statements,” Lee said. “And I believe that the briefers and the President believe that they had a basis for concluding that there was an imminent attack. I don’t doubt that. It’s just frustrating to be told that and not get the details behind it.”
Watch Lee’s remarks on CNN below:
Mike Lee says he didn’t hear anything in the briefing about four embassies targeted by Soleimani pic.twitter.com/wEee6JshNJ
— TPM Livewire (@TPMLiveWire) January 12, 2020
Lee also echoed similar sentiments during appearances on CBS’ “Face the Nation” later Sunday morning, saying that Trump’s claim that four threats were under threat from Iran should have been shared beyond “the Gang of Eight.”
Watch Lee’s remarks on CBS below:
.@SenMikeLee tells @margbrennan that intelligence suggesting a plot to attack multiple US embassies in the Middle East should have been shared with the entire Congress. “The Gang of Eight does not equal Congress,” he said. pic.twitter.com/fXhIgDToA3
— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) January 12, 2020
.@SenMikeLee on Congress’ intelligence briefings this week: “The problem is not with the president but with the briefers.” pic.twitter.com/TdCU102n9N
— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) January 12, 2020
This is just trivia, but Utah is a R+20 state.
The chimp is Lee, but he ain’t grinning.
Lee knows that †Я☭mp is full of shite, but refuses to say so…like everybody else with an R attached to his/her name.
What will be interesting are the future self-justifications for such behavior we see every day from the Rs. Deliberate or ignorant? Savvy or stupid? Fearful or cowardly? etc.
Exactamente. Just like rMoney, he could go big and bold and still win reelection into infinity
Lee went out of his way to defend Trump, while throwing Pompeo to the wolves, apparently not realizing consequences of decisions rests with the leader of the government.
A large plurality of Americans were already skeptical of the bellicosity of Trump’s actions, and this will add more fuel to that fire.
Curious to me that Lee chose to do these very public interviews when he could have just stayed home.