First Lady Set To Respond To School Lunch Critics

First lady Michelle Obama and Food Network chef Rachel Ray discuss the lunches students from the Eastside and Northside Elementary Schools receive during a "Let's Move!" program at the Clinton, Miss., schools Wednesd... First lady Michelle Obama and Food Network chef Rachel Ray discuss the lunches students from the Eastside and Northside Elementary Schools receive during a "Let's Move!" program at the Clinton, Miss., schools Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013. The pair visited with the children and conducted a cooking contest between the schools' chefs. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis) MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — First lady Michelle Obama is answering Republicans in Congress who want to roll back healthier school meal standards, holding an event at the White House to highlight the success of the health guidelines.

The Tuesday event is an unusual move for the first lady, who has largely stayed away from policy fights since she lobbied for congressional passage of a child nutrition law in 2010.

Sam Kass, director of Mrs. Obama’s Let’s Move initiative to combat childhood obesity, said a Republican bill that would allow schools to opt out of the standards is “a real assault” on administration efforts to make foods healthier for kids.

Kass, who is a White House chef, said the event is an attempt to point out the successes of some schools that have implemented the standards, which were set by the Obama administration and Congress over the past several years. School nutrition officials from across the country will speak about how well the standards are working in their schools.

“She wants to have a conversation about what is really happening out in the country,” as opposed to Washington, Kass said. “These standards are working.”

An agriculture spending bill approved by a House subcommittee last week would allow schools to waive the standards if they have a net loss on school food programs for a six-month period. Rep. Robert Aderholt, R-Ala., who wrote the bill, said he was responding to requests from school food directors.

The standards championed by the first lady have been phased in over the past two school years, with more changes coming in 2014. The rules set fat, calorie, sugar and sodium limits on foods in the lunch line and beyond.

While many schools have had success putting the rules in place, others have said they are too restrictive and costly. Schools pushing for changes say limits on sodium and requirements for more whole grains are particularly challenging, while some school officials say kids are throwing away fruits and vegetables that are required.

The Agriculture Department, which administers the rules, has tweaked them along the way to try to help schools that have concerns. The department scrapped limits on the amount of proteins and grains that kids could eat after students complained they were hungry. Last week, USDA announced it would allow some schools to delay serving whole grain pastas just hours after the House subcommittee approved the opt-out language.

School groups have been split. The School Nutrition Association, which represents school nutrition directors and companies that sell food to schools, has lobbied for changes to the standards, saying some are too restrictive.

The national PTA is pushing lawmakers to keep the standards intact.

“At a time when families are working hard to live healthy lives, school meals should be supporting families’ efforts, not working against them,” PTA President Otha Thornton wrote to members of Congress.

___

Follow Mary Clare Jalonick on Twitter at http://twitter.com/MCJalonick

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

8
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. What always gets me is the supposed reason of the anti healthy lunch crowd that kids are now “throwing away their food” and therefore the program doesn’t work.

    They use the bs reason, because saying “it’s impacting the profit margins of our corporate sponsors” doesn’t go down very well with their constituents.

    Anyway, the “throw away food” food statement always gets me because it assumes that the kids didn’t throw away their food before the change to begin with. These folks have clearly never been inside of a school cafeteria.

  2. Kick ass, Michelle! It’d be good if you also said a few words to those halcyon GOTPers who only believe “rural children” (aka white kids) deserve meal programs outside the school year while “urban children” (aka “non-white” kids) do not.

  3. These folks have clearly never been inside of a school cafeteria.

    Or they don’t know very much about children. Yes, you have a push a new food on a kid over and over again before he’ll try it. That’s what you do. That’s how it works.

  4. Can someone explain what a net loss is for a school lunch program. Are the repugs expecting schools to make a profit on their lunch programs?

  5. I hate to keep repeating myself, but can these detractors get any more disgusting. As someone said above, yeah kids don’t like new food and especially healthy food,too bad. They don’t know what’s best.

    We have doctors saying they are seeing obese babies for goodness sake. I have been taking notice myself of how many overweight young kids I am seeing - a couple belonging to some of my co-workers who should know better - but the parents are in denial or make some excuse.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

2 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for austinite Avatar for chammy Avatar for mtsmalls Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for smokinthegotp Avatar for joefromlowell Avatar for jinmichigan

Continue Discussion