Merrick Garland Recuses Himself From Handling Kavanaugh Ethics Complaints

Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland meets with Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) in his office in the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill April 21, 2016 in Washington, DC. President Barack Obama nominated Garland to replace Associate Justice Antonin Scalia who passed away earlier this year.
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 21: Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland arrives in the office of Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) before a meeting in the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill April 21, 2016 in Washington, DC.... WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 21: Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland arrives in the office of Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) before a meeting in the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill April 21, 2016 in Washington, DC. President Barack Obama nominated Garland to replace Associate Justice Antonin Scalia who passed away earlier this year. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit announced Saturday that Chief Judge Merrick Garland recused himself from handling ethics complaints filed against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, according to Buzzfeed.

Buzzfeed reports that the statement does not give an explanation for why Garland decided to recuse himself nor does it contain an update for the status of the Kavanaugh ethics complaints. Garland’s nomination for the Supreme Court in 2016 failed after Republicans refused to act on any Obama nominee.

Since Kavanaugh’s Senate testimony and his response to allegations of sexual misconduct, the current court of the Supreme Court nominee received multiple ethics complaints filed against him.

Although the chief judge of the circuit typically handles ethics cases, they have the option to recuse themselves if they find that the “circumstances warrant disqualification” under the federal judiciary’s rules.

Latest News
192
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jeof jeof says:

    Wait I thought the new standard for how you deal with conflicts as a judge is that you go on TV and engage in an angry, sob-choked display alternating between furious spitting rants about conspiracies and vows for revenge on the other party, and bouts of self-pity and apologies for getting angry. Recusing yourself quietly sounds way too professional, non-partisan, and responsible for a federal judge.

  2. As if the difference between ethics and Republicans needed to be highlighted further…

  3. Avatar for hoagie hoagie says:

    Judge Garland is acting like a judge. Any ruling he would make would be viewed as biased no matter how valid. Also, why should he have to go through the agony of this?

  4. Avatar for dont dont says:

    While Clarence continues to sit on cases where wifey has taken political positions and income.

  5. IOKIYAR… forever and always.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

186 more replies

Participants

Avatar for sandi Avatar for ajm Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for bobatkinson Avatar for squirreltown Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for impurescience Avatar for sniffit Avatar for arrendis Avatar for darcy Avatar for nemo Avatar for esva Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for junebug Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for tompaine73 Avatar for texastoast Avatar for 19tibekius6 Avatar for phlogiston Avatar for motezart Avatar for rascal_crone

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: