McConnell Immediately Dismisses Manchin Voting Compromise As ‘Equally Unacceptable’

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 15: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), joined by fellow Senate Republicans, speaks to reporters after a Republican Senate luncheon at the U.S. Capitol Building on June 15, 2021 in Wa... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 15: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), joined by fellow Senate Republicans, speaks to reporters after a Republican Senate luncheon at the U.S. Capitol Building on June 15, 2021 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images) MORE LESS

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) made short work of any notion that Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D-WV) voting compromise would attract Republican support, calling it “equally unacceptable” to the original For the People Act and “totally inappropriate.” 

Flanked by eight GOP senators, McConnell held a special additional press conference on S.1, Thursday, seemingly feeling the need to hammer his criticisms in the wake of Manchin nudging a door open to intra-Democratic compromise on the bill. 

In both his remarks and a statement released around the same time, McConnell emphasized that the compromise had been endorsed by Stacey Abrams. He painted the proposal as a federal takeover of state-run elections — a “solution in search of a problem.” 

“All Republicans, I think, will oppose that as well if that were to be surfaced on the floor,” he said of Manchin’s proposed alterations to S.1. “That’s not what we anticipate the cloture motion to be on.”

Thus, Manchin’s proposals represent more of a compromise amid the Democratic Party than any involving Republicans, who have positioned themselves against federal voting safeguards. 

Before the release of his memo, Manchin had declared himself against voting legislation that lacked Republican buy-in. The new document at least indicated his policy positions, though some experts see them as a mixed bag. 

“Overall, it’s encouraging that he’s supporting this kind of stuff and discouraging that he left a lot of stuff out,” Bill Yeomans, a longtime voting rights expert at the Department of Justice and lecturer at Columbia law school, said. “There’s so much stuff here that it’s hard to make sense of without more detail — but Joe’s in the game, that’s good.” 

Even if his reforms were to be added into S.1 immediately, before next week’s vote, the bill almost certainly wouldn’t pass. With the filibuster in place and no Republican support, Democrats alone can’t vote it into law. Anti-filibuster advocates hope that the pressure to pass the bill, which Democrats have marketed as crucial to beat back the existential threat to democracy, will convince Manchin and fellow filibuster supporter Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) to change or eliminate the Senate rule. 

Neither has indicated that they plan to do so, though Manchin’s memo at least heightens the chances that, if his concerns are addressed, there will be 50 votes for the bill and a stronger case against the filibuster.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: