McConnell Backs Bipartisan Bill To Prevent Next Jan. 6

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 27: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) walks to the Senate Chambers in the U.S. Capitol Building on September 27, 2022 in Washington, DC. Later today the U.S. Senate will vote on... WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 27: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) walks to the Senate Chambers in the U.S. Capitol Building on September 27, 2022 in Washington, DC. Later today the U.S. Senate will vote on a procedural vote for legislation to provide short-term government funding, which includes energy permitting provisions supported by Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV). (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Wednesday afternoon, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) signaled his support for a bill seeking to overhaul the Electoral Count Act of 1887, a century-old election administration law.

The Senate Rules Committee debated on the bill soon afterwards, where the Kentucky Republican gave a speech expressing his support for the legislation.

“After 150 years, the Electoral Count Act needs some modest updates,” McConnell said on the Senate floor. 

The ECA dictates how vote counts are certified in Congress after an election. It fell under the national spotlight after John Eastman, a conservative lawyer who used to work for former President Donald Trump, tried to hijack  the law’s vague language to claim that then-Vice President Mike Pence could call the 2020 election for Trump.

This year, both the House and Senate introduced bills to rewrite the bill to plug holes in its vague language. The House passed its version of the bill last week, and it’s a bit more sweeping than the Senate’s Electoral Count Reform Act (ECRA). But as it stands, the Senate bill may be more likely to make its way to President Biden’s desk.

The ECRA was first proposed by Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) back in July after months of behind-the-scenes talks to get the 10 Republicans on board needed to overcome the Senate filibuster. Like the House bill, it clarifies that the vice president’s role in the vote certification process is purely ministerial and raises the threshold required for lawmakers to object to a vote count.

McConnell did include some caveats: Considering the bill as is enabled peaceful transitions of power for generations, “we need to be delicate and careful with any changes,” he said. “But the chaos that came to a head on January 6th of last year strongly suggests that we find careful ways to clarify and streamline the process.”

He also referenced past transitions for Republican presidents-elect as more evidence that the ECA needed reform in a nod to his conservative base.

“For more than twenty years now every time voters have picked a Republican president, we’ve seen some Democrats and Congress resist the people’s decision and try to challenge the electoral count. So the situation obviously called for careful, methodical and bipartisan work to arrive at a careful, methodical and bipartisan product.”

“I look forward to supporting the legislation as introduced in committee,” he finished.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Don’t believe it and what is his angle?

  2. Evidently the polling is in. Who new Americans would prefer democracy to autocracy? Go figure.

  3. Avatar for nycabj nycabj says:

    Golly. Who would ever imagine that McConnell, just before midterms involving some very far right folks who would kick him to the side in a minute, decides to come out as Mr. Reasonable? He’s playing 4th dimension chess and every move is aimed at keeping power - his power.

  4. I have to agree with McConnell. The Democrats are the problem. /snark

  5. For all of his many faults, McConnell considers himself a patriot and wants the system to continue to function as a democracy. He’s never been onboard the Trump train, and definitely isn’t a fan of the move of the Republican party towards fascism…the fact that he’s one of the people responsible for that path probably isn’t something he realizes. And, he probably does see the possibility of Democrats cheating the system to install their own candidate as president, especially as demographics shift, and he wants to keep Republicans in power as long as possible.

    Put all that together, and it’s not really a surprise he’d support this…I’m sure he it looking at it as a way to guarantee no interference when Republicans win the White House, because he’s focused on Republican power, but it’s still also a good thing for the nation. We’ll see if there is follow through though, it’s always possible he’s planning to torpedo this because he’s secretly onboard the Trump train but has hidden it until now.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

101 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for becca656 Avatar for inversion Avatar for drriddle Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for tiowally Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for nycabj Avatar for grack Avatar for libthinker Avatar for yellowbeard Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for krew Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for old_guru Avatar for Ethics_Gradient

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: