Appeals Court: Bakery Can’t Refuse To Make Wedding Cake For Gay Couple

Figurines are depicted in an embrace as part of the wedding cake display at Masterpiece Cakeshop, in Denver, Thursday, June 6, 2013. A gay couple is pursuing a discrimination complaint against the Colorado bakery, sa... Figurines are depicted in an embrace as part of the wedding cake display at Masterpiece Cakeshop, in Denver, Thursday, June 6, 2013. A gay couple is pursuing a discrimination complaint against the Colorado bakery, saying the business refused them a wedding cake for a family reception because they are a gay couple, and alleging that the owners have a history of turning away same-sex couples. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

DENVER (AP) — A suburban Denver baker who wouldn’t make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple cannot cite his religious beliefs in refusing them service because it would lead to discrimination, the Colorado Court of Appeals ruled Thursday.

The decision is the latest victory for gay couples, who have won similar cases in other states. Gay rights supporters and religious freedom advocates have passionately debated whether individuals can cite their beliefs as a basis for declining to participate in a same-sex wedding ceremony.

And it is bound to get more heated after the U.S. Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

In the Colorado case, Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, declined to make a cake for Charlie Craig and David Mullins in 2012. They were married in Massachusetts but planned to celebrate in Colorado.

After the ruling, Phillips faces fines if he refuses to make wedding cakes for gay couples. Phillips has maintained that he has no problem serving gay people at his store but says that making a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding would violate his Christian beliefs.

His attorneys have said they would consider appealing up to the U.S. Supreme Court. They said there are bound to be more cases where businesses’ religious convictions clash with gay rights.

In recent cases elsewhere, a bakery in the Portland, Oregon, area that declined to make a wedding cake for a gay couple two years ago was ordered to pay $135,000 in damages in July.

Two years ago, the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled that a photographer who wouldn’t take pictures of a gay couple’s 2006 commitment ceremony violated the state’s anti-discrimination law.

And in Washington state, a florist has been fighting a lawsuit filed after she refused to provide services for a gaywedding in 2013.

Phillips’ case started in Colorado’s Civil Rights Commission, where Craig and Mullins filed their complaint. In December 2013, a judge for the commission ruled that Phillips discriminated against the couple and ordered him to change his store policy against making cakes for gay weddings or face fines.

Phillips then went to the Colorado Court of Appeals.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
27
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for dnl dnl says:

    I’m sure the Trinity is glad to have so many Xians to do the judging for it…

  2. Phillips has maintained that he has no problem serving gay people at his store but says that making a wedding cake for a same-sex wedding would violate his Christian beliefs.

    I was unaware that scripture covered the issue of gay wedding cakes. I think he made that up.

  3. Avatar for mantan mantan says:

    What specifically about the cake-making process violated “his Christian beliefs”? Was it the ingredients, the decoration or personal knowledge of the customer beyond the sphere of the cake-making process or market purchase?

  4. You would think…or I would think that after such a long struggle Gays would be a bit more tolerant. Their fight for acceptance ( tolerance ) is not over but just how to they get there with shit like this? They were beat up for 1000’s of years and now they want to do the beating?

    This is a private citizen. I agree with everyone on the public / government official thing. They should resign. But this is a fucking private person that bakes cakes. He has no history of harming Gays folks and admits he has nothing against them. Did he say “fuck you fag” to them? No. He said I cannot bake that cake and be true to my religious beliefs. So why beat him up. Get your cake elsewhere. If he’s objecting on faith and not hate…go get your fucking cake at another joint.

    Or take it to SCOTUS where The Catholic Boyz will rule Fuck You Queer in the name of Jesus and it all goes to shit.

  5. Jesus did turn fish to more fish, right? That must have been because he didn’t want any gay people eating wedding cake…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

21 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for paulw Avatar for alliebean Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for humpback Avatar for damiana Avatar for mantan Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for harry_r_sohl Avatar for fortunatolucchesi Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for hugopreuss Avatar for dnl Avatar for kc63

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: