BALTIMORE (AP) — An emergency commission has been created in Maryland to redraw boundaries for a sprawling congressional district in compliance with a federal court order, the state’s Republican governor announced Monday.
Gov. Larry Hogan said a “nonpartisan” nine-member commission will craft a redistricting plan for the state’s 6th congressional district that isn’t tarnished by gerrymandering. In Maryland, Democrats were in charge of the last controversial redistricting and the state’s congressional map is often held up as a highly partisan patchwork.
“The outcome of decades of redistricting cycles has made Maryland’s congressional and legislative districts an embarrassment,” Hogan told reporters at a news conference.
He said the commission he is creating by executive order will be made up of three Democrats, three Republicans, and three unaffiliated voters.
Hogan’s announcement comes weeks after a panel of U.S. judges unanimously ordered Maryland to submit a new map for its meandering 6th district, now stretching from vote-rich suburbs of the nation’s capital to rural western parts of the mid-Atlantic state.
The federal panel said the lines must be drawn using “traditional criteria for redistricting,” showing regard for “natural boundaries.” In a decision written by 4th U.S. Circuit Court Judge Paul Niemeyer, the state’s 2011 congressional map that removed roughly 66,000 Republican voters from the 6th district and added around 24,000 Democratic voters brought about “the single greatest alteration of voter makeup in any district in the Nation following the 2010 census.”
That Democrat-drawn redistricting in 2011 has been cited by critics as a major reason former Democratic Rep. John Delaney was able to oust 10-term Republican Roscoe Bartlett in 2012. In the November midterm elections, Democrat David Trone won the sixth congressional district, the only open seat due to the departure of Delaney, who is running for president.
Some Republican voters had sued over the 6th district’s boundaries, claiming Democrats who controlled the governorship and legislature blatantly redrew the map to put more Democrats in the competitive district. The U.S. Supreme Court reviewed the case before referring it back to a lower court, effectively allowing the 2011 map to remain in place for this year’s election cycle.
Earlier this month, Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the federal panel’s recent order for state officials to draw up a new redistricting plan by early March. Frosh, a Democrat, also filed a separate request for the redistricting case to remain on hold until the Supreme Court acts on the state’s appeal.
Hogan on Monday blasted Frosh’s involvement, asserting that the state’s attorney general “continues to be on the wrong side of this fight and the wrong side of history.”
A spokeswoman for Frosh’s office said it had no comment.
Hogan on Monday also stressed that it’s high time for Maryland politicians to get out of the way of redistricting decisions, arguing that the large majority of state residents want a neutral party to draw electoral maps.
“The legislature cannot continue fighting against the will of the people,” said Hogan, who pledged to introduce a bill called the Redistricting Reform Act of 2019 during the first day of the next legislative session.
“The people of Maryland and the federal courts agree that the time for our state to act is now to finally restore balance and fairness to our elections, to once and for all remove the politics and the politicians from the process of drawing their own districts,” he said.
Hogan has already appointed three commissioners to redraw the 6th district: Retired Judge Alexander Williams, a registered Democrat; Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and a registered Republican; and Ashley Oleson, an unaffiliated voter. The remaining six members will be chosen by their applications in coming days and will be made up of a similar political balance, according to the governor.
Hogan vowed that the new commission, when completed, will hold livestreamed sessions and meetings will be open to the public.
Even though it is the Democrat’s who are getting hit here, this is the right thing to do. A partisan gerrymander is wrong whomever it may favor.
Texas goes first. Nobody cut to the front of this line out of any sense of morality and fairness. Texas, you are nonpartisan redistricting’s lead off batter. Batter up!
Some walk-up music, for ya:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQoXnz3h_FEThis assumes Hogan’s panel will be fair, which I doubt. He’s got no reason to be moderate now that he’s in his second and final term as governor.
So I might be a little slow here but how does one redraw the boundaries of just one district? Shouldn’t all the districts be looked at?
If the first three members of the commission are any sign, the fix will be in.
So one retired judge who may or may not have registered as a democrat for electoral purposes (yes, they have partisan judicial elections). One hard-right republican activist who will have access to however much computing power and mapmaking expertise he wants, and one “unaffiliated” voter whose history he knows but we don’t.
With enough public scrutiny this could still produce decent results.
But the other main result is that the case doesn’t reach the supreme court, so there’s no conflict that would have pitted a republican-leaning case against democratic-leaning ones.