McSally Proposes Bill To Make Domestic Terrorism A Federal Crime

Senator Martha McSally (R-AZ), speaks at the 2019 American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Policy Conference, at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, D.C., on Monday, March 25, 2019. (Photo by Cheriss May/NurPhoto)
Senator Martha McSally (R-AZ), speaks at the 2019 American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Policy Conference, at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, D.C., on Monday, March 25, 2019. (Pho... Senator Martha McSally (R-AZ), speaks at the 2019 American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Policy Conference, at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, D.C., on Monday, March 25, 2019. (Photo by Cheriss May/NurPhoto via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Martha McSally (R-AZ) has put forth a bill that would make acts of domestic terrorism federal crimes.

According to CBS News, domestic terrorism is currently defined in U.S. law, but not named as one specific crime, so terrorists can get a range of charges and punishments.

“The absence of a federal domestic terrorism crime makes it more difficult to track acts of domestic terror and reduces uniformity in charging and sentencing,” McSally told CBS.

The bill includes a requirement of an annual report to assess the national climate and threats of future terrorism.

The legislation comes on the heels of mass shootings in Dayton and El Paso, both of which were carried out by U.S. citizens.

Another lawmaker, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R), has directed the Texas Department of Public Safety to form a task force on domestic terrorism in response to those shootings, per ABC News. 

Latest News
56
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Except for “a requirement of an annual report to assess the national climate and threats of future terrorism” this is a Nothingburger designed put off dealing with the problem: Weapons of war on the streets.

  2. I don’t know AZ politics but I wonder if this might come from a different motivation: somebody trying to get ahead of the train?

  3. Eh. Trying to stay relevant I guess. She seems to need something to bring her poll numbers up. Don’t think this will do it.

  4. As long as it makes possession of an AR-15 or an AK-47/74 without a strictly controlled federal license an act of domestic terrorism, I’m good with this.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

50 more replies

Participants

Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for kilgoretrout Avatar for krusher Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for texasaggie Avatar for sniffit Avatar for sparrowhawk Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for rudolphschnaubelt Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for darrtown Avatar for sharong Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for jwr12 Avatar for noonm Avatar for expatls1954 Avatar for uneducated Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for csurz420

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: