Republican Mark Harris Won’t Run In New North Carolina House Election

Mark Harris listens to the public evidentiary hearing on the 9th Congressional District investigation Monday afternoon, Feb. 18, 2019, at the North Carolina State Bar in Raleigh.
Mark Harris listens during a public evidentiary hearing on the 9th Congressional District investigation at the North Carolina State Bar in Raleigh, N.C., Monday, Feb. 18, 2019. (Juli Leonard/The News & Observer via AP, Pool)

Mark Harris, the Republican candidate in the North Carolina congressional election that gained national election for allegations of election fraud, announced Tuesday that he would not run in the do-over election in the district.

In a statement, Harris cited “the extremely serious [health] condition that I faced in mid-January” and a surgery he said was scheduled for the last week in March as his reasons for not running again. In a recent hearing before the North Carolina State Board of Election, Harris said he’d suffered a severe infection and two strokes in January.

Harris did not mention the election fraud allegations that plagued his campaign, but did endorse Union County Commissioner Stony Rushing in the next election.

In the recent elections board hearing, Harris’ own son testified that the congressional candidate disregarded his warnings about the tactics employed by political operative Leslie McCrae Dowless.

Soon after that testimony, Harris himself joined Democrats in calling for a new election. Harris’ Democratic opponent, Dan McCready, has said he will run in the do-over election.

“Though I thought I was ready to undergo the rigors of this hearing and am getting stronger, I clearly am not, and I struggled this morning with both recall and confusion,” Harris said in the hearing, after detailing his recent medical history. “Neither I nor any of the leadership of my campaign were aware of or condoned the improper activities that have been testified to in this hearing.”

He continued: “Through the testimony I’ve listened to over the past three days, I believe a new election should be called. It has become clear to me that the public’s confidence in the Ninth District seat general election has been undermined to an extent that a new election is warranted.”

The bipartisan board subsequently voted unanimously to hold a do-over election. Do-over elections are exceedingly rare, especially at the federal level. A grand jury will now determine whether to bring charges against anyone involved in the election fraud scandal.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: