Republican Mark Harris Won’t Run In New North Carolina House Election

Mark Harris listens to the public evidentiary hearing on the 9th Congressional District investigation Monday afternoon, Feb. 18, 2019, at the North Carolina State Bar in Raleigh.
Mark Harris listens during a public evidentiary hearing on the 9th Congressional District investigation at the North Carolina State Bar in Raleigh, N.C., Monday, Feb. 18, 2019. (Juli Leonard/The News & Observer via AP, Pool)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Mark Harris, the Republican candidate in the North Carolina congressional election that gained national election for allegations of election fraud, announced Tuesday that he would not run in the do-over election in the district.

In a statement, Harris cited “the extremely serious [health] condition that I faced in mid-January” and a surgery he said was scheduled for the last week in March as his reasons for not running again. In a recent hearing before the North Carolina State Board of Election, Harris said he’d suffered a severe infection and two strokes in January.

Harris did not mention the election fraud allegations that plagued his campaign, but did endorse Union County Commissioner Stony Rushing in the next election.

In the recent elections board hearing, Harris’ own son testified that the congressional candidate disregarded his warnings about the tactics employed by political operative Leslie McCrae Dowless.

Soon after that testimony, Harris himself joined Democrats in calling for a new election. Harris’ Democratic opponent, Dan McCready, has said he will run in the do-over election.

“Though I thought I was ready to undergo the rigors of this hearing and am getting stronger, I clearly am not, and I struggled this morning with both recall and confusion,” Harris said in the hearing, after detailing his recent medical history. “Neither I nor any of the leadership of my campaign were aware of or condoned the improper activities that have been testified to in this hearing.”

He continued: “Through the testimony I’ve listened to over the past three days, I believe a new election should be called. It has become clear to me that the public’s confidence in the Ninth District seat general election has been undermined to an extent that a new election is warranted.”

The bipartisan board subsequently voted unanimously to hold a do-over election. Do-over elections are exceedingly rare, especially at the federal level. A grand jury will now determine whether to bring charges against anyone involved in the election fraud scandal.

Latest News
69
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Called it. Reasons for not running are bogus…but who cares. He’s gone and the election is on.

  2. “The March surgery, intended to implant a conscience, is considered a risky procedure among preachers who run for office as Republicans.”

  3. FINALLY. Now Virginia can become a blue state…albeit just barely.

  4. So the Republicans get caught cheating and get rewarded with a do-over without their toxic candidate. And McCready has to to go through the expense of running another campaign, and basically has to win two elections to get the seat.

    Bullshit. Harris should have been disqualified and McCready declared the winner.

  5. Avatar for choan choan says:

    So Republicans can put forth an untainted candidate (if one can be found?)?

    That doesn’t seem quite right to me …

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

63 more replies

Participants

Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for scg Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for easydm Avatar for thebigragu Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for pb Avatar for robcat2075 Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for rod Avatar for spin Avatar for krux Avatar for drtv Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for phlogiston Avatar for zillacop Avatar for choan Avatar for occamscoin

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: