Marc Short: Trump Had ‘Snake Oil Salesmen’ Giving Him ‘A Lot Of Bad Advice’ On Pence’s Authority

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 16: White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short listens during a White House daily briefing at the James Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House March 16, 2018 in Washington, D... WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 16: White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short listens during a White House daily briefing at the James Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House March 16, 2018 in Washington, DC. White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders held a daily briefing to answer questions from members of the White House Press Corps. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Marc Short, who served as former Vice President Mike Pence’s chief of staff, on Sunday offered some insight into the ex-VP’s decision to counter former President Trump’s efforts to get him to overturn the 2020 election.

Appearing on MSNBC’s “Meet the Press,” Short said that Trump’s assertion “merited response” from Pence because it was false. During a Federalist Society conference on Friday, Pence said that Trump was “wrong” to insist that his former VP had the authority to overturn the results on the day he presided over the joint session of Congress last year certifying Joe Biden’s electoral victory.

“Of course there’s nothing in the 12th Amendment or the Electoral Count Act that would afford a vice president that authority,” Short said. “It’s why no vice president in 200 years has ever used that authority, and it’s certainly not one that I think conservatives or Republicans would want Kamala Harris the ability to say she’s going to reject votes from Texas or Wyoming or any other state heading into 2024.”

Short went on to say that he believes President Biden was “duly elected” because in reality “there was not enough significant fraud” that would have justified overturning any state’s election results.

Asked whether Trump received any legal advice regarding his efforts to overturn the election results and whether Pence considered doing the former president’s bidding, Short likened many of Trump’s advisers to “snake oil salesmen.”

“I think, unfortunately, the President had many bad advisers who were basically snake-oil salesmen, giving him really random and novel ideas as to what the vice president could do,” Short said. “But our office, you know, researched then recognized that was never an option.”

Short said he was unsure whether Trump’s ambitions to overturn the election results could be chalked up to bad advisers themselves or the former president going out of his way to seek bad advice.

Short then reiterated that Pence never believed that he had the authority to overturn the results during his term as president of the Senate.

“I think that, honestly, he did get a lot of bad advice, but I think that it was not something that the vice president – from the very beginning he counseled the President, ‘I don’t think I have that authority, always willing to look at something that you want to send our way,’ but never thought he had that authority,” Short said.

Short added that Trump and Pence “did not have conversations” on Jan. 6 while the ex-VP was in the Capitol. The former VP’s chief of staff said that he had a conversation with then-Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows during the breaching of the Capitol.

Pressed on whether he thinks the Jan. 6 Committee will subpoena Pence, Short said he believes that would be a “pretty unprecedented step” for the panel to take.

“It would be, I think, very difficult for me to see that scenario unfolding,” Short said.

Short’s interview comes on the heels of his reported testimony before the committee following a subpoena. According to CNN, Short testified before the committee in person during a lengthy session late last month. Short’s testimony came after he previously produced a limited number of documents that were subpoenaed by the panel. The documents reportedly included a memo from Trump aide Johnny Mentee likening former President Trump to Thomas Jefferson.

It is unclear whether Pence himself will testify before the committee, but committee Chair Bennie Thompson confirmed last month that the panel has asked to speak to the former VP directly.

The former VP’s legal team has reportedly had early, informal discussions with the committee, according to CNN. However, Pence is reportedly looking to aides such as Short to act as his “proxy” instead of having to appear before the committee himself.

Short, who is among the former VP’s closest advisers, accompanied Pence for most of Jan. 6. Short was with Pence after the then-VP as evacuated from the Senate chamber and moved to a safe location beneath the Capitol as Trump supporters breached the building.

Short’s cooperation could potentially offer insight into Pence’s whereabouts on the day of the deadly Capitol insurrection, including the then-VP’s interactions with Trump as the then-President publicly demanded that Pence not certify Joe Biden’s electoral victory on Jan. 6.

Additionally, Short was a firsthand witness to Trump and conservative attorney John Eastman’s pressure campaign to convince Pence to delay the count of the Electoral College votes during a meeting in the Oval Office on Jan. 4.

Watch Short’s remarks below:

Latest News
166
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Short then reiterated that Pence never believed that he had the authority to overturn the results during his term as president of the Senate.

    Conversation with Dan Quayle ring a bell, Short?

    BTW,

    Pence’s team, including his chief of staff, Marc Short, have been cooperating with the January 6 committee, and the committee will get a pile of records from Pence on March 3 unless a court stops Archivist of the United States David Ferriero from delivering them. It is likely Pence knows there is plenty that will come into the open to make siding with the Trump folks politically problematic. But there is more to his statement than that. While Pence stopped short of saying Biden won the election fairly, his rejection of the plot to overturn Biden’s victory and destroy our democracy suggests he is courting the old business wing of the party.

    Pence has been closely allied with the billionaire libertarian Koch family throughout his political career and likely hopes to be a 2024 presidential candidate with their backing. Short, too, is allied with Koch family interests, and according to Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), foundations and trusts associated with the Kochs are among the deep-pocketed funders of the Federalist Society, where Pence made his statement. The oligarchical wing of the party is, perhaps, making a bid to regain control over the party in the hopes that the insurrectionists will crash and burn.

  2. Some of the rats are jumping ship.

  3. Dump and Pants are alike in one way: They are all about themselves attaining power. Pants’ recent rebuttal is his way of positioning himself for a presidential run in 2024. It’s gonna be tough to thread the needle of not insulting Dump but saying Dump is wrong. Good luck with that Pants. I hope neither of them ever get close to the Oval Office again.

  4. “Short said he was unsure whether Trump’s ambitions to overturn the election results could be chalked up to bad advisers themselves or the former president going out of his way to seek bad advice.”

    “Unsure.” Given the source, and the fact that he has already testified before the 1/6 committee, that sounds pretty damning. One hopes, and suspects, that Trump and his inner circle of thugs and malefactors are feeling more uncomfortable than when they woke up this morning.

  5. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    I think, unfortunately, the President had many bad advisers who were basically snake-oil salesmen, giving him really random and novel ideas as to what the vice president could do,” Short said.

    What’s the world coming to when you hire snake oil salesmen - solely for their ability to produce prodigious amounts of snake oil -then they give you snake oil? I mean…who could have predicted?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

160 more replies

Participants

Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for daveminnj Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for globalguy Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for left_in_washington_state Avatar for califdemdreamer Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah Avatar for tsp Avatar for Anarchy_Bunker Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for qwerty23 Avatar for justruss Avatar for sbscott Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for kovie Avatar for old_guru Avatar for iafixture

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: