Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) on Wednesday doubled down on his opposition to blowing up the filibuster or even weakening it, striking a blow to Democrats hoping he could be swayed to do so to advance their sweeping voting rights bill and other major legislation.
Manchin argued in a Washington Post op-ed that the filibuster, a Senate procedure that requires 60 votes for a bill and that Republicans use constantly to thwart the Democrats’ agenda, “is a critical tool to protecting that input and our democratic form of government.”
“That is why I have said it before and will say it again to remove any shred of doubt: There is no circumstance in which I will vote to eliminate or weaken the filibuster,” he wrote. “The time has come to end these political games, and to usher a new era of bipartisanship where we find common ground on the major policy debates facing our nation.”
The senator also signaled disapproval of using budget reconciliation, which only requires a simple majority, to pass Democratic legislation.
“I simply do not believe budget reconciliation should replace regular order in the Senate. How is that good for the future of this nation?” he asked. “Senate Democrats must avoid the temptation to abandon our Republican colleagues on important national issues.
“Republicans, however, have a responsibility to stop saying no, and participate in finding real compromise with Democrats,” he added.
Manchin indicated that he wants to follow regular order when it comes to considering big legislative priorities.
“Voting rights reforms, instituting health-care protections and changes to the federal tax code and business regulations take time to implement on the state and local levels,” the senator wrote. “If the filibuster is eliminated or budget reconciliation becomes the norm, a new and dangerous precedent will be set to pass sweeping, partisan legislation that changes the direction of our nation every time there is a change in political control. The consequences will be profound — our nation may never see stable governing again.”
Manchin has said before that he does not support weakening the filibuster by lowering its 60-vote threshold.
However, the senator has also left the door open to reforming the procedure to make it “a little bit more painful,” such as changing it to a talking filibuster. His op-ed does not say whether his refusal to “weaken” the filibuster means he no longer potentially supports that reform. TPM has reached out to the senator’s office for clarification.
I hope Biden is leaning on this twerp, hard.
Manchin’s self-righteous, sanctimonious twaddle becomes more annoying by the day.
It’s hardly surprising. Sen. Schumer, change the goddamned filibuster to a talking filibuster already, and mandate that as the purpose of the filibuster is to encourage debate on the issue of the legislation, talking about issues other than the legislation will be considered yielding the floor.
That would be nice – except that Manchin would be respond by being very vocal about how he’s resisting the pressure to cave on his principles: “Oh, look, West Virginians! See how I’m sticking up for you by resisting my own party!”
If Democrats really want pressure on Manchin, they should try to get West Virginia voters to see how much infrastructure spending and other economic benefits the state is likely to lose out on because of Manchin’s resistance. That would get his attention.
You know Joe, WV is almost certainly going to replace you with some Trump-loving nut job. The least you could do is actually try and help your constituents on the way out the door. But no. You have to keep playing your own middle-of-the-road bullshit games instead.
Just a waste of fucking space.