Maine Republican Demands Recount In 1st Ranked Balloting Election

FILE - This combination of file photos show U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin in 2017, left, and state Rep. Jared Golden in 2018, right, in Maine. Golden challenged Poliquin for the 2nd District Congressional seat in the Nove... FILE - This combination of file photos show U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin in 2017, left, and state Rep. Jared Golden in 2018, right, in Maine. Golden challenged Poliquin for the 2nd District Congressional seat in the November 2018 general election. Golden, who finished behind Republican U.S. Rep. Poliquin in the first round of balloting in Maine's new voting system, came from behind to flip the U.S. House seat representing one of two congressional districts in the state, election officials said Thursday, Nov 15, 2018. (AP Photos/Robert F. Bukaty, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Republican U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin requested a recount Monday in a historic election that his Democratic opponent Jared Golden won thanks to ranked balloting, setting up a lengthy hand count of ballots.

Election officials anticipate the recount will take about a month, causing a race to ensure the process is completed before the new Congress is seated Jan. 3.

The recount will be more laborious under Maine’s new way of voting because all candidates were ranked on ballots, exponentially increasing the effort, said Kristen Schulze Muszynski, spokeswoman for the secretary of state.

“It’s far more complex than a typical recount,” she said.

Poliquin had the most first-round votes, but his lead didn’t hold up after an additional round under Maine’s ranked-choice voting.

Golden emerged victorious after two trailing candidates were eliminated and their supporters’ second-choices were reallocated with assistance from a proprietary computer algorithm. With the votes reassigned, Golden won the election by about 3,500 votes , based on updated tallies from election officials.

Poliquin’s campaign raised questions about the transparency of the computerized algorithm and said Maine voters were confused and concerned that their votes didn’t count “due to computer-engineered rank voting.”

“Therefore, today, we are proceeding with a traditional ballot recount conducted by real people,” said spokesman Brendan Conley.

Golden said Poliquin was within his right to request a recount, but said he’s unlikely to succeed. “Dragging this process out only hurts the people we were elected to serve,” Golden said in a statement.

After the election, Poliquin claimed he won “the constitutional ‘one-person, one-vote’ first-choice election” on Election Day. He filed a federal lawsuit seeking to have the new voting system declared unconstitutional.

Golden declared himself the “majority consensus winner” thanks to the new election system used for the first time in U.S. House and Senate races.

Maine voters approved the voting system in 2016.

The ranked-choice system lets voters rank all candidates from first to last on the ballot. If no one gets a majority, then last-place candidates are eliminated and their second-place votes are reallocated.

The goal, supporters say, is to eliminate the impact of spoiler candidates and ensure that the winner collects a majority of the vote.

In this case, additional voting tabulations were triggered because Poliquin and Golden both collected 46 percent of first-place votes, meaning neither candidate collected a majority of the vote.

Poliquin has several legal options if he comes up short in the recount process overseen by Democratic Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap.

He could let his lawsuit play out in U.S. District Court, seek to bypass First Circuit altogether to go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court, or ask the U.S. House of Representatives to seat him instead of Golden.

U.S. District Judge Lance Walker, who declined Poliquin’s request to stop the tabulations, agreed to hear more arguments next week.

Because of the margin of victory, Poliquin had to pay a $5,000 deposit in requesting the recount. He’ll get it back if he’s declared winner.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Ranked choice voting is a very good idea. It allows people to express their preference for third party candidates, while guarding against the possibility that in so doing they will allow a truly awful candidate to win. It would almost certainly have given Gore a victory over Bush in 2000 while allowing people to vote for Nader, It might well have given Hillary a win in 2016 (not sure it’s been studied).

    It’s a fair system and one chosen by the voters of Maine and I would say the same if it had given the Republican a win, rather than the Democrat.

  2. “Because of the margin of victory, Poliquin had to pay a $5,000 deposit in requesting the recount. He’ll get it back if he’s declared winner.”

    So this is like a coach’s challenge in the NFL—you get the timeout back if you win?

  3. Too bad he can pay for a recount as this SHOULD get tossed by federal courts. However sore losers are taking the Franken election mess as an primer.

    If states can legitimately apportion electoral votes by sections of the state, e.g. OK, surely voters can apportion votes. Plus, states rights, state laboratories, etc that GOP likes to trot out.

  4. Sore loser, but a loser nonetheless. I can’t wait till he moves his sorry behind to Florida. Where all bad pols go to die.

  5. Agreed. Brucie was never one with the district, he kept winning due to other ballot measures that brought out the knuckleheads in droves. And the dems needed a good candidate. Golden is a good one, brucie needs to leave.!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

28 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for fgs Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for romath Avatar for radicalcentrist Avatar for scottnatlanta Avatar for bob Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for vlharpley Avatar for mainemomma Avatar for ryokyo Avatar for jinnj Avatar for pmaroneyb Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for birdford Avatar for john819 Avatar for nickstokes Avatar for pwmesq Avatar for johnsd

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: