Louisiana GOP Rebukes Cassidy For Reversal Vote On Constitutionality Of Trump’s Impeachment

United States Senator Bill Cassidy (Republican of Louisiana) listens during the US Senate Committee on Finance "Hearing to Consider the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson Proposal" on the repeal and replace of the Afforda... United States Senator Bill Cassidy (Republican of Louisiana) listens during the US Senate Committee on Finance "Hearing to Consider the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson Proposal" on the repeal and replace of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) also known as "ObamaCare" in Washington, DC on Monday, September 25, 2017. Credit: Ron Sachs / CNP ' NO WIRE SERVICE ' Photo by: Ron Sachs/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

An unexpected reversal from Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy (LA) who voted in favor of the constitutionality of former President Donald Trump’s impeachment on Tuesday, drew ire from the Louisiana Republican Party who quickly issued a statement to criticize the move.

“We feel that an impeachment trial of a private citizen is not only an unconstitutional act, but also an attack on the very foundation of American democracy, which will have far reaching and unforeseen consequences for our republic,” the party wrote in a statement Tuesday.

“We also remind all Americans that former President Trump is innocent of the politically motivated, bogus charges now pending against him in a kangaroo court presided over by an openly hostile political opponent,” the statement said.

The news comes after Cassidy became one of just six Republicans who joined Democratic colleagues on Tuesday to vote that the impeachment trial against former President Donald Trump is constitutional. Cassidy was the only Republican to switch his vote in a trial that has thus far been widely viewed as predetermined, after an initial vote on constitutionality last month.

Cassidy said the reason he had flipped was because Trump’s attorneys hadn’t been convincing in their case, suggesting the former president’s lawyers had done “a terrible job” of arguing their case on the trial’s opening day.

The Louisiana lawmaker told reporters that while House impeachment managers were “focused” and put forward a “compelling argument” Trump’s team was by contrast “disorganized, random, had nothing.”

“They talked about many things, but they didn’t talk about the issue at hand,” Cassidy said after the  56-44 final vote closed the first day’s proceedings.

It remains unclear what to make of the Republican senator’s decision to break from his previous stance in favor of moving forward with the trial. It seems unlikely that he will part with Republicans who by and large do not want to convict Trump.

“I have not yet decided on how I will vote,” Cassidy told the Associated Press during a phone call ahead of the afternoon trial on Tuesday. 

Cassidy is in a position that is distinctly different from some of his GOP colleagues after winning reelection this fall for a six-year term, that gives him some leverage to have less fear over retribution from Trump loyalists in his state.

Cassidy was also one of just a few senators who recognized President Joe Biden’s electoral victory weeks ahead of  colleagues who continued for weeks to prop up bogus conspiracy theories about a stolen election.

In its statement on Tuesday night, Louisiana’s Republican Party praised the state’s junior GOP senator, John Kennedy, for voting against moving ahead with the impeachment trial.

Kennedy has appeared to use the impeachment trial as party of an effort to reinforce his chances of reelection next year, painting the trial as unconstitutional and calling it according to AP: “a thinly veiled effort by the uber-elites in our country, who look down on most Americans, to denigrate further those people who chose to vote for President Trump and not vote for President Biden.”

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Why are Republicans so afraid of integrity?

    Is it because they’re so unfamiliar with it?

  2. Louisiana Republicans, so close and yet so far:

    “an attack on the very foundation of American democracy, which will have far reaching and unforeseen consequences for our republic”

  3. More disarray. I’ve been waiting for decades to see Republicans fall apart this way.

  4. Attack? Are they talking about Fort Sumter? I’m so confused…

  5. It’s like Fourth Grade with these guys.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

89 more replies

Participants

Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for cervantes Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for dickweed Avatar for mrf Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for schmed Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for mount_baldy Avatar for birdford Avatar for brian512 Avatar for maximus Avatar for skeptical Avatar for agnesbee Avatar for karlwlewis Avatar for katex Avatar for garrybee Avatar for normb Avatar for Volvo_Birkenstock Avatar for murphkowski Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: