Residents Sue California City Over Vote To Exempt Itself From Sanctuary Law

SANTA ANA CA MARCH 27, 2018 --- People opposing SB-54 celebrate. The Orange County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution to condemn the state's sanctuary laws. They also voted to join the Feds in their lawsuit against State of California. (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)
SANTA ANA, CA - MARCH 27: People opposing SB-54 celebrate on March 27, 2018 in Santa Ana, California.. The Orange County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution to condemn the state's sanctuary laws. They also vot... SANTA ANA, CA - MARCH 27: People opposing SB-54 celebrate on March 27, 2018 in Santa Ana, California.. The Orange County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution to condemn the state's sanctuary laws. They also voted to join the Feds in their lawsuit against State of California. (Photo by Irfan Khan/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

SANTA ANA, Calif. (AP) — Residents sued the tiny Southern California city of Los Alamitos on Wednesday to challenge a vote by elected officials to exempt the community from a state law that limits police collaboration with U.S. immigration authorities.

The American Civil Liberties Union and other immigrant rights advocates said the lawsuit was filed in Superior Court in Orange County. It contends the city of 12,000 people cannot choose which state laws to follow and which laws to ignore, and that the actions of Los Alamitos leaders are wasting taxpayer money and scaring immigrants from attending church services.

“You can’t hurt people in your community so you get airtime on Fox News,” said Jessica Karp Bansal, litigation director for the National Day Laborers Organizing Network and a lawyer for plaintiffs.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the group Los Alamitos Community United and a local pastor and an attorney. It came after Los Alamitos leaders voted to exempt the community from California’s so-called immigrant sanctuary law, which limits police collaboration with federal deportation agents and aims to keep immigration enforcement out of public schools.

Mayor Troy Edgar said he had not seen the lawsuit and would be limited in what he could say about pending litigation. Messages seeking comment left at Los Alamitos City Hall were not immediately returned.

The lawsuit follows a spate of actions by Republican elected officials in at least a dozen California cities and in the state’s Orange and San Diego counties in recent weeks on the ‘sanctuary’ law. Most have voted to lend support to a U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit filed last month against California or passed resolutions stating their position.

Los Alamitos, however, voted to adopt a local ordinance to exempt the city from California’s law, which immigrant advocates say could erode community members’ trust in local police and dampen attendance at church and community events.

California’s Democratic legislature passed the state law last year in response to President Donald Trump’s calls for more deportations and a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

The opposition has been largely in Orange County cities but has recently expanded to others.

It comes as Republicans aim to hold onto four key congressional seats in this year’s elections in Orange County, a region of 3.2 million people that was long considered a GOP stronghold but voted for Hillary Clinton over Trump in the 2016 presidential election.

Latest News
8
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. There’s gonna be a ton of these suits coming, because the legal residents of CA, the actual US citizens, are waking up to the tremendous costs they are paying to protect criminal illegals. A huge number of cities are not protecting criminals. San Diego Ct, on the front lines of the invasion of illegals, no longer wants to be considered a sanctuary.

  2. No one said anything about protecting criminals…in fact, ICE is still in the loop in the case of criminals who commit violent crimes. The state of CA is standing up against ICE raiding the homes of people who have done nothing, or maybe had a DUI at some point, or are covered by DACA. ICE is grabbing whoever they can instead of doing their job finding the dangerous undocumented immigrants and throwing them out.

    Nice try on the dog whistles, but you cave it away trying to call all of them criminals. Try to be more subtle next time.

  3. There are only two problems, Nick: Nobody is “protecting criminal illegals,” and there are no “tremendous costs.”

    Basically, and as usual, you’re making shit up. Your bigotry is showing.

    Edited to add, as for the “ton of these suits coming,” do let us know once you have thought of a legal rationale for such lawsuits. The legal rationale in this case is that the local government thinks it can void the state laws it doesn’t like. I suspect that the local government may be in for a surprise on this one.

  4. Immigrant topic, he appears. He’s a raging hate filled bigot and lies as much as Hannity.

  5. Lol “invasion of illegals”

    I hate to break it to you buddy, but evolution is real. How do I know this? Because we’ve all evolved to hear those dog whistles loud and clear these days. Now that it’s not just dogs that can hear it, though, we should come up with a new name for that kind of talk.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

2 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for nickdanger Avatar for imkmu3 Avatar for drriddle Avatar for an_american Avatar for bentobox Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for firstoff

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: