Nebraska Panel Approves Keystone Pipeline Expansion Despite Oil Leak

TransCanada's Keystone pipeline facilities are seen in Hardisty, Alberta, Canada, on Friday, Nov. 6, 2015.  Following the Obama administration’s rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline, the oil industry faces the tricky task of making sure the crude oil targeted for the pipeline still gets where it needs to go.  (Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT
FILE- This Nov. 6, 2015, file photo shows a sign for TransCanada's Keystone pipeline facilities in Hardisty, Alberta, Canada. TransCanada Corp.’s Keystone pipeline leaked oil onto agricultural land in northeastern ... FILE- This Nov. 6, 2015, file photo shows a sign for TransCanada's Keystone pipeline facilities in Hardisty, Alberta, Canada. TransCanada Corp.’s Keystone pipeline leaked oil onto agricultural land in northeastern South Dakota, the company and state regulators said Thursday, Nov. 16, 2017, but state officials don’t believe the leak polluted any surface water bodies or drinking water systems. (Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press via AP, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — A Nebraska commission approved an alternative route for the Keystone XL oil pipeline through the state on Monday, removing the last major regulatory obstacle to building the long-delayed $8 billion project.

The Nebraska Public Service Commission’s vote on the long-delayed project could still be challenged in court. The alternative route would run farther north than the preferred route proposed by pipeline developer TransCanada Corp., which plans to build a 1,179-mile (1,897-kilometer) pipeline from Canada across several U.S. states.

The vote could clear the way for the company to gain access to the property of holdout landowners who vehemently oppose the pipeline, using the state’s eminent domain laws. More than 90 percent of Nebraska landowners along the route have agreed to let TransCanada bury the pipeline beneath their property, but those who oppose it have managed to thwart the project for years.

The project also faces intense opposition from environmental groups and Native American tribes. Business groups and some unions support the project as a way to create jobs and reduce the risk of shipping the oil by trains that can derail.

President Donald Trump issued a federal permit allowing for the project in March, reversing President Barack Obama administration’s rejection of it. TransCanada had said that it would announce in late November or early December whether it planned to proceed with building the pipeline, taking into account the Nebraska decision and whether it has lined up enough long-term contracts to ship oil.

Opponents are expected to appeal the Nebraska decision in a state district court, and the case is likely to end up before the Nebraska Supreme Court. The commission was forbidden by law from considering a recent oil spill in South Dakota on the existing Keystone pipeline in its decision.

The proposed Keystone XL would expand the existing Keystone pipeline, which went into service in July 2010. The current pipeline network runs south through North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas and extends east into Missouri and Illinois.

The new pipeline would carry an estimated 830,000 barrels of oil a day from the oil sands areas of Canada through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska, where it would connect with the existing Keystone pipeline. The pipeline would then continue through Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas to the coast.

TransCanada has said its route through Nebraska is the most direct way to transport oil from Alberta, Canada, to an existing pipeline in Steele City, Nebraska.

The commission decision based on evidence presented at a public hearing in August. The elected commission is composed of four Republicans and one Democrat.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. I hope they run it through downtown Omaha.

  2. It will run through poor towns, small-scale farms, and Native American land. Pollution is a regressive tax foisted upon the weak by the rich.

  3. Avatar for tpr tpr says:

    The commission was forbidden by law from considering a recent oil spill in South Dakota on the existing Keystone pipeline in its decision.

    Umm… why? How is this not a reasonable thing to consider?

    Seems like the game is already over.

  4. If they run more pipe maybe it will reduce the pressure and won’t leak this time…er then again it might mean more places to leak!

  5. Keya Paha - 88.63
    Boyd - 85.03
    Holt - 85.07
    Antelope - 83.27
    Boone - 79.14
    Nance - 77.79
    Merrick - 77.24
    Polk - 78.54
    York - 73.66
    Fillmore - 72.42
    Saline - 58.49
    Jefferson - 68.66

    Here are the counties affected by the Keystone XL route and the precentage of voters in each county that voted for Trump. But, yes, obviously the real problem here is that the route doesn’t affect the residents of one of the two counties in the state to go for Clinton. After all these voters didn’t vote for Trump to have a pipeline on their land. They voted for Trump so he could fuck the blacks and Mexicans in Omaha, so whats all this bullshit of them facing consequences for their ellectoral decisions? They are Real AmericansTM, unlike them latte drinking city folk and minorities in Omaha, they aren’t suppose to face consequences for their actions!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

5 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for boidster Avatar for keninmn Avatar for dickweed Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for tpr Avatar for coprophagoussmile

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: