Appeals Court Rules Against Kansas Voter Restriction Championed By Kobach

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach listens as US President Donald Trump speaks during the first meeting of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building nex... Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach listens as US President Donald Trump speaks during the first meeting of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next to the White House in Washington, DC, July 19, 2017. / AFP PHOTO / SAUL LOEB (Photo credit should read SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Kansas’ proof-of-citizenship voter registration requirement in a decision issued Wednesday.

The appeals court backed the trial judge’s finding that the requirement, which was championed by then-Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (R), violated both the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution and the National Voter Registration Act.

The appeals court pointed to the record that been established during the 2018 trial that showed that some 30,000 Kansans were removed from the rolls due to the requirement. Kobach — who led the trial arguments for the state — could only provide 39 examples of noncitizens being registers to vote in Kansas within the last 19 years.

The appeals court concluded that the “significant burden” that the law was shown to impose on voters was not justified by the “incredibly slight evidence that Kansas’s interest in counting only the votes of eligible voters is under threat.”

“[W]e agree with the Secretary that Kansas’s interest in counting only the votes of eligible voters is legitimate in the abstract, but, on this record, we do not see any evidence that such an interest made it necessary to burden voters’ rights here,” the appeals court said.

Much of the opinion focused on distinguishing the Kansas case from a 2008 Supreme Court ruling okaying an Iowa voter ID requirement.

The 10th Circuit said that Kansas’ back-up plan for voters who didn’t have proof of their citizenship — in which they were required to participate in a board hearing with top state officials — was not comparable to the “safety valve” laid out in the Iowa law, which let voters without ID sign affidavits affirming their identity.

The Kansas procedure procedure “has only been used five times,” the appeals court noted, “and we agree with the district court’s finding that its byzantine nature ‘adds, not subtracts, from the burdensomeness of the law.’”

A spokesperson for Kansas’ Attorney General’s office, which took over arguing the case when it was at the appellate phase, told TPM in an email that the office was “evaluating the court’s opinion and will consult with the Secretary of State on next steps.”

When Kobach was secretary of state, he made clear his plans to appeal the case all the way up to the Supreme Court if need be. Kobach lost his 2018 gubernatorial bid and is now running for U.S. Senate.

On Twitter, Kobach promised that, if appealed to the Supreme Court, “it is highly likely that the high court will overturn the decision.”

His successor in the Kansas secretary of state’s office has backed off Kobach’s aggressive approach somewhat. For instance, the current secretary of state, Scott Schwab, voluntarily relinquished the voter fraud prosecutorial powers Kobach had fought for when he was Kansas’ top elections official.

One of the three appellate court judges who heard the arguments in the case died last month and did not participate in the final decision. The opinion was written by Judge Jerome Holmes, a George W. Bush-appointee, and Holmes was joined by Judge Mary Beck Briscoe, a Clinton appointee.

Read the opinion below:

Notable Replies

  1. As I understand it, judges still can’t use sound effects in official documents.

    sad trombone

  2. Sucks to be you these days, Kris. Or any day.

  3. Poor Kris. Poor, poor Kris.

    He lost to a girl and then this.

  4. Has Mr. Kobach had any of his pet initiatives around voting and voting restrictions accepted by the courts? The man is, how can I say this, not the sharpest knife in the drawer if you know what I mean.

  5. Doesn’t matter…this is going straight to the Fascist Five for more gutting of the VRA. That’s the whole point.

    But her emails…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

60 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajoguy Avatar for cervantes Avatar for nellieh Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for becca656 Avatar for sniffit Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for esva Avatar for riverstreet Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for mrf Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for southerndem Avatar for docd Avatar for tsp Avatar for brian512 Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for drtv Avatar for greenman66 Avatar for inthesedays Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for montana37

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: