Dems Devise Clever Way To Counter Trump Stonewalling On Impeachment

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) attends a news conference on April 9, 2019. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

House Democrats’ plans for their impeachment proceedings include a clever provision to punish the White House for stonewalling the investigation.

On Tuesday night the House Judiciary Committee released a set of impeachment protocols to go along with the broader resolution that the House will likely vote on this week, outlining the public phase of its impeachment inquiry.

The new impeachment protocols offer the President the due process rights that Republicans complain have been absent in the inquiry, but they come with a twist.

A provision in the package says that if the President “unlawfully” refuses “to make witnesses available for testimony to, or to produce documents requested by” the committees currently leading the impeachment probe, the House Judiciary Committee chairman will have the right to deny the due process procedures outlined in the procedures.

The provision appears to be a reference to the White House’s directive to the administration that it not comply with document requests or make available officials for testimony. Several administration officials have defied the blockade, but others have cited it to dodge testifying, and multiple document requests by the House have gone unfulfilled.

The due process procedures that Trump otherwise would have access to are similar to or go beyond what was available for previous presidents who faced impeachment, according to a comparison chart released by the House Democrats.

The President’s lawyers would be able to respond to the presentations related to the probe given to the House Judiciary Committee. They may also be able to cross-examine witnesses in the Judiciary Committee and raise objections to the evidence being presented in those proceedings. Additionally, under the procedures, the President may offer evidence or request other testimony for the proceedings, but whether such evidence is “necessary or desirable to a full and fair record in the inquiry,” will be up to the committee.

The House Rules Committee is marking up the broader impeachment procedures package on Wednesday, and it is expected that a full floor vote on the resolution will happen Thursday, before the House leaves for an 11-day recess.

Read the proposed House Judiciary impeachment procedures below:

Latest News
254
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Doesn’t matter what they put in there. The Republicans will continue to deny the legitimacy of the proceedings and refuse to comply.

    This is a complete stonewall that they’re hoping will ultimately be upheld by the Supreme Court, or whatever court they’ve spent the last 10 years packing.

  2. If Rachel Mitchell isn’t allowed to slut-smear witnesses, then it’s a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham, and Matt Gaetz is just gonna hafta shut it down!

    For Jesus.

  3. Most parents understand that, when you’re dealing with a toddler, you treat him like a toddler. Trying to mold behavior by treating him like an adult is futile.

    The consequences are clearly spelled out in language even Shithead can understand.

  4. Uh, anyone else think it’s a big mistake to take an 11-day recess now? Seems like it really undercuts the severity of the proceedings.

  5. The Democrats really are having to deal with a petulant child and his enablers.

    This kind of thing - you don’t get your candy if you’re not a good boy - has not been necessary with previous administrations or impeachment inquiries, no matter how big the disagreements and how tough the fight … because adults were in charge of those administrations.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

248 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for xpurg8d Avatar for cervantes Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for becca656 Avatar for musgrove Avatar for katwillow Avatar for tena Avatar for texastwostep Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for brian512 Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for flemingmf Avatar for maracel Avatar for bwillator Avatar for justruss Avatar for timorwig Avatar for godwit Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for philmore Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for paul_lukasiak Avatar for n_b

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: