Virginia Judge Won’t Delay Gay Marriage Ruling

In this photo taken Aug. 4, 2010, same-sex marriage supporters gather outside a federal building and wait for a judge's decision overturning California's same-sex marriage ban in San Francisco. A federal appeals cour... In this photo taken Aug. 4, 2010, same-sex marriage supporters gather outside a federal building and wait for a judge's decision overturning California's same-sex marriage ban in San Francisco. A federal appeals court put same-sex weddings in California on hold indefinitely Monday, Aug. 16, 2010, while it considers the constitutionality of the state's gay marriage ban. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — A federal appeals court refused Wednesday to delay its ruling striking down Virginia’s gay marriage ban, which means that same-sex couples could begin marrying in the state as early as next week.

The state would also need to start recognizing marriages from out of state by next Wednesday, assuming the U.S. Supreme Court does not intervene.

A county clerk in northern Virginia had asked the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond to stay its decision, issued in late July, while it is appealed to the high court. The appeals court’s order did not explain why it denied that request.

Ken Connelly, legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, which is representing Prince William County Clerk of Court Michele B. McQuigg in the case, said the group will seek an emergency stay from the nation’s highest court “as soon as possible.” That request will go to Chief Justice John Roberts, who is responsible for the 4th Circuit.

Virginia voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2006 that banned gay marriage and prohibited the recognition of such marriagesperformed in other states. The appeals court ruling overturning that ban was the third such ruling by a federal appeals court and the first in the South.

Last week, a panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati considered arguments regarding six cases from Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee. Some observers have said the 6th Circuit may be the first to uphold statewide gay marriage bans after more than 20 consecutive rulings in the past eight months striking them down.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for twresq twresq says:

    I’m not sure that a county clerk would have standing to appeal the decision. I would think that only the state A.G. or the governor would.

  2. The Virginia A.G. and Governor won’t They are for gay marriage

  3. Avatar for ajayne ajayne says:

    Chief Justice Roberts will issue a stay - likely after involving the full SCOTUS. The clerk does have standing according to the appellate court - which is why they ruled instead of kicking it back. Apparently VA law supports that determination.

    One more step that must be taken before the SCOTUS has no choice but to grant cert to at least one of these cases for the next session…

  4. My bet is still that SCOTUS won’t grant cert, unless a circuit court or two rule against. No reason to get their hands dirty again if they don’t have to. Which is why I also bet, at this time, that Roberts won’t grant a stay.

  5. I think that the Clerk would because that is who issues the licenses.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for hippocritic Avatar for ajayne Avatar for twresq Avatar for gibbous Avatar for southerndem

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: