Judge Orders Eastman To Prove That He Has A Real Reason To Assert Attorney-Client Privilege Over Trump Docs

on June 4, 2013 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 04: Clockwise from the left, Kevin Kookogey, founder and president of Linchpins of Liberty; Diane Besom of the Laurens County Tea Party; John Eastman, chairman of the National Organization for ... WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 04: Clockwise from the left, Kevin Kookogey, founder and president of Linchpins of Liberty; Diane Besom of the Laurens County Tea Party; John Eastman, chairman of the National Organization for Marriage; Sue Martinek of the Coalition for Life of Iowa; and Becky Gerritson of the Wetumpka Tea Party; testify during a hearing before the House Ways and Means Committee June 4, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The committee heard from six representatives of groups that were targeted by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for special scrutiny. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The federal judge overseeing ex-Trump legal adviser John Eastman’s battle against the House Jan. 6 Committee on Monday ordered the lawyer to back up the attorney-client privilege claims he’s made as he seeks to shield his communications with ex-President Donald Trump and others from the committee.

Judge David Carter of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California noted in his order that the Jan. 6 Committee had objected to Eastman’s privilege claims for 130 records (which adds up to 568 pages) of his communications dating Jan. 4 to Jan. 7 of last year. Committee lawyers have argued that Eastman hasn’t proven the existence of the official legal service that he claims prevents him from turning over the communications — he hasn’t proven that the attorney-client relationship exists.

“The Select Committee has repeatedly noted the significance of communications immediately before and after the January 6 attack on the Capitol,” Carter wrote. “Given the investigation’s urgency, the Court finds it appropriate to expedite its privilege review of the January 4-7, 2021 documents.”

The judge ordered Eastman to file a brief supporting his privilege claims for each document in question, plus evidence of “all attorney-client and agent relationships” he had asserted in his privilege log.

“Dr. Eastman shall also provide evidence documenting any attorney-client relationships that existed with his clients,” Carter wrote.

The judge gave Eastman a deadline of Feb. 22. The House committee will then have until March 2 to file its opposition, according to the order.

Carter scheduled the next hearing for March 9.

The order is the latest development in the House committee’s efforts to dig into Eastman’s involvement in then-President Donald Trump’s crusade to steal the 2020 election, which culminated in the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection. Eastman had drawn up an outlandish plot in which Vice President Mike Pence tosses out Joe Biden’s electors during Congress’ certification of the election results and replaces them with fake Trump electors.

Read Carter’s order below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. I just want to know how long Eastman has this idea of how to overturn an election sitting on his computer?

  2. So he has to prove TFG paid him?

    LOL good luck John.

  3. Wouldn’t Trump have had to have paid Eastman a retainer? Trump never pays

  4. Avatar for tena tena says:

    Well, this is fun.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

232 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for becca656 Avatar for lastroth Avatar for leftcoaster Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for jinnj Avatar for tsp Avatar for known_thespian Avatar for edhedh Avatar for marymaryquitecontrary Avatar for rhs1963 Avatar for ekcambridge Avatar for karlwlewis Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for zenicetus Avatar for randome

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: