Judge: Navarro Failed To Prove Trump Invoked Executive Privilege Over His Jan. 6 Testimony

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 31: Former Trump White House Advisor Peter Navarro walks out of the Prettyman Courthouse after appearing in federal district court for a motion hearing on August 31, 2022 in Washington, DC. Na... WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 31: Former Trump White House Advisor Peter Navarro walks out of the Prettyman Courthouse after appearing in federal district court for a motion hearing on August 31, 2022 in Washington, DC. Navarro has been indicted by a grand jury on two counts of contempt of Congress. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta shot down former top Trump White House economic adviser Peter Navarro’s argument that Donald Trump asserted executive privilege over testimony Navarro was subpoenaed to give to the Jan. 6 House select committee in winter 2022.

“There was no formal invocation of executive privilege by [Trump] after personal consideration nor authorization to Mr. Navarro to invoke privilege on his behalf,” Mehta said, according to Politico reporter Kyle Cheney.

That means his trial for contempt of Congress will begin next week, with jury selection slated to start September 5.

The Jan. 6 select committee first subpoenaed Navarro in Feb. 2022 as part of its investigation into the attack on the Capitol and Trump and his allies’ actions in the days and weeks leading up to it. Navarro refused to comply with the subpoena asking him to testify and wouldn’t turn over relevant records. In response, he was charged on two counts of criminal contempt of Congress.

During the Wednesday hearing, Mehta ordered that Navarro’s contempt of Congress trial move forward as the former Trump administration official had not convinced him that Trump explicitly asserted privilege over Navarro’s potential testimony to the Jan. 6 committee.

The judge noted that even if privilege was invoked, Navarro would have still had to show up and assert the privilege on a question-by-question basis, and produce a privilege log for the committee.

The judge hinted at his thinking during the Monday pre-trial hearing — where Navarro testified in his own defense — calling his arguments “pretty weak sauce.”

“I still don’t know what the president said,” Mehta told Navarro’s attorney Stanley Woodward this week, referring to a Feb. 2022 call between Trump and Navarro. Navarro has repeatedly pointed to this call as proof that the former president made it clear to him that he was invoking executive privilege over Navarro’s congressional testimony. But Navarro’s lawyer told the judge earlier this month that Trump was not expected to testify on Navarro’s behalf to back up his claims. 

 “I don’t have any words from the former president,” Mehta said. “That’s pretty weak sauce.”

Latest News
83
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for jwbuho jwbuho says:

    But Navarro’s lawyer told the judge earlier this month that Trump was not expected to testify on Navarro’s behalf to back up his claims.

    Hung out to dry, and by someone he thought was his pal.

  2. Peter, Peter, Peter!

    To know you is to hate you.

    Signed,

    San Diego, CA

  3. Charisma and brilliance will only get you so far.

  4. He definitely has that Sears Appliance Center assistant manager energy…

    382

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

77 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for heart Avatar for daveminnj Avatar for jw1 Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for clearwater Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for darrtown Avatar for benthere Avatar for ted Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for rickjones Avatar for tmulcaire Avatar for michaelryerson Avatar for brian512 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for bcgister Avatar for jwbuho Avatar for jackofalltirades Avatar for timbomov Avatar for Tang

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: