Judge Hears Arguments On Whether To Release Georgia Grand Jury’s Trump Report

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 24: U.S. President Donald Trump answers questions while departing the White House April 24, 2019 in Washington, DC. Trump is scheduled to travel to Georgia later today.(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A Georgia state judge on Tuesday weighed whether, when, and how much of a grand jury report into President Trump’s attempt to subvert the 2020 election result should be released.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney appeared to lean towards releasing at least some of the report, compiled by a special grand jury empaneled in January 2022 to investigate the election subversion efforts.

Tuesday’s hearing was heavy on arguments about procedure and state-level grand jury secrecy, and light on details about the report itself.

At one point, McBurney suggested that grand jurors followed many of the same investigative steps as those taken by the January 6 Committee, meaning that the content may be similar to what the House committee released last year.

Fani Willis, the Fulton County DA investigating Trump, said at the outset of the hearing that she opposed the report’s release.

“It is not appropriate at this time to have the report be released,” Willis said.

McBurney seemed skeptical of that argument, at one point asking, “what would prevent a special purpose grand juror from reaching out to the media and saying, ‘I’ll tell you what’s in the report?'”

The judge said that he would not issue a ruling immediately, and might ask for further briefing before making a decision. The report could be released in segments, with redactions, or pending indictments that Willis described as “imminent,” depending on his decision.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Well much as would like to read what the Grand Jury’s conclusions are I would probably defer to Fani. Of course CNN and other MSMers want to show them and then tell us “how wrong they are.”

  2. Shut your anus-mouth, Dump.

  3. the content may be similar to what the House committee released last year

    I suspect that we already “know” the stuff in the parts of the GJ report that get made public. What the GJ adds is making it official, a legal finding of fact out of what previously was 2nd-hand news reports or informed speculation.

    So, I’m not expecting to learn anything new here though I do hope there’s some good squirming in the transcripts of Lindseymat et al.

  4. From the Article:

    ["Fani Willis, the Fulton County DA investigating Trump, said at the outset of the hearing that she opposed the report’s release

    ‘It is not appropriate at this time to have the report be released,’ Willis said.

    McBurney seemed skeptical of that argument, at one point asking, ‘what would prevent a special purpose grand juror from reaching out to the media and saying, ‘I’ll tell you what’s in the report?’ ’ ”

    The judge said that he would not issue a ruling immediately, and might ask for further briefing before making a decision. The report could be released in segments, with redactions, or pending indictments that Willis described as ‘imminent,’ depending on his decision."]

    (emphases added)

  5. I would love to read the transcripts, especially where they reveal what various people testified to. But if I had to choose, I’d be perfectly fine not knowing those details if it guaranteed that indictments happen.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

41 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for adamfree Avatar for robertbrk Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for josephebacon Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for globalguy Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for inversion Avatar for johncrandell Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for tsp Avatar for brian512 Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for grants Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for dominic Avatar for 19tibekius6 Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for dicktater Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for IBecameACitizenforthis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: