Judge: Gov’t Is Defying, Or Doesn’t Understand, Order On Family Separations

A young protester takes part in a march and rally against the separation of immigrant families June 30, 2018 outside the detention facility of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Los Angeles, Californ... A young protester takes part in a march and rally against the separation of immigrant families June 30, 2018 outside the detention facility of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Los Angeles, California. - Thousands of demonstrators, baking in the heat and opposed to the US immigration policy, marched across the country Saturday, June 30, 2018 to protest the separation of families under President Donald Trump's hardline agenda. (Photo by Mark RALSTON / AFP) (Photo credit should read MARK RALSTON/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter
SAN DIEGO (AP) — A federal judge, responding to a plan to reunify children separated at the border, said he was having second thoughts about his belief that the Trump administration was acting in good faith to comply with his orders.The Justice Department on Friday filed a plan to reunify more than 2,500 children age 5 and older by a court-imposed deadline of July 26 using “truncated” procedures to verify parentage and perform background checks, which exclude DNA testing and other steps it took to reunify children under 5.The administration said the abbreviated vetting puts children at significant safety risk but is needed to meet the deadline.

Chris Meekins, deputy assistant Health and Human Services secretary for preparedness and response, filed a declaration that he is fully committed to meeting the deadline. However, he does not believe “the placing of children into such situations is consistent with the mission of HHS or my core values.”

U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw took umbrage at Meekins’ statement, disputing the official’s interpretation of his orders and saying that safe reunification could and will occur by July 26.

“It is clear from Mr. Meekins’s declaration that HHS either does not understand the court’s orders or is acting in defiance of them,” the judge wrote late Friday. “At a minimum, it appears he is attempting to provide cover to defendants for their own conduct in the practice of family separation, and the lack of foresight and infrastructure necessary to remedy the harms caused by that practice.”

Sabraw, an appointee of President George W. Bush, said Meekins’ statement calls into question his comments in court hours earlier that the administration was acting in good faith.

Sabraw said in court Friday that the administration had largely complied with orders but, at the same time, he indicated he will be monitoring its actions ahead of the deadline.

The judge said the administration must provide a list of names of parents in immigration custody and their children by Monday and complete background checks for them by Thursday. He scheduled four hearings over the next two weeks for updates, including one on Monday.

“The task is laborious, but can be accomplished in the time and manner prescribed,” he wrote in his order.

Read Judge Sabraw’s most recent order below:

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Chris Meekins, deputy assistant Health and Human Services secretary for preparedness and response, filed a declaration that he is fully committed to meeting the deadline. However, he does not believe “the placing of children into such situations is consistent with the mission of HHS or my core values.”

    So Chris Meekins was a Chief of Staff for which Congresscritter? Advised on Health Policy to whom? How does a former employee of an investment bank research analyst on healthcare and insurance know anything about kids?

    And dude you needed to state “my core values” as “my sincerely held beliefs,” you broke with the agreed upon verbage.

  2. “It is clear from Mr. Meekins’s declaration that HHS either does not understand the court’s orders or is acting in defiance of them,” the judge wrote…

    But, ignorance of the law is no excuse, right!

  3. With the civil rights movement, the federal government enforced court orders. Who is going to enforce them if the trumpies tell the courts to piss up a rope? And that is not meant to be snark.

  4. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    “It is clear from Mr. Meekins’s declaration that HHS either does not understand the court’s orders or is acting in defiance of them,” the judge wrote late Friday.

    This is a tough call for me. This Administration is comprised, top to bottom, of morons wholly ignorant of law, history, or really anything, but they’re also malicious criminals flouting laws and norms. Shall we just say both and let him keep poor lonely Manafort company?

  5. Ok on another note they found the one Trump political appointee that thinks he knows how to vet, the value of vetting, but doesn’t understand a court order.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

71 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajm Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for epicurus Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for yskov Avatar for lastroth Avatar for stephen_maturin Avatar for gr Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah Avatar for ljb860 Avatar for noonm Avatar for uneducated Avatar for brian512 Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for krux Avatar for drtv Avatar for godwit Avatar for geniustrumpvoter Avatar for desertdweller

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: