Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Against Charlottesville Over Rally Response

on August 12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA - AUGUST 12: White nationalists, neo-Nazis and members of the "alt-right" clash with counter-protesters as they enter Emancipation Park during the "Unite the Right" rally August 12, 2017 in Charl... CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA - AUGUST 12: White nationalists, neo-Nazis and members of the "alt-right" clash with counter-protesters as they enter Emancipation Park during the "Unite the Right" rally August 12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia. After clashes with anti-fascist protesters and police the rally was declared an unlawful gathering and people were forced out of Emancipation Park, where a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee is slated to be removed. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. (AP) — A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit against Charlottesville, its former police chief and the former Virginia State Police superintendent over their response to a white nationalist rally that descended into violence.

A Verona-based law firm sued after the Aug. 12 rally on behalf of Robert Sanchez Turner, who said he attended to peacefully protest.

The lawsuit said police and state troopers watched nearby but didn’t intervene as Turner was approached by “KKK members/sympathizers,” who sprayed him with mace and beat him.

The judge wrote in an opinion Tuesday that there was no constitutional right supporting Turner’s claims against Al Thomas or Stephen Flaherty, the police chief and superintendent at the time. The judge dismissed a claim against the city as well.

Attorneys for Turner couldn’t immediately be reached.

7
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Honestly the main reason the police didn’t do much to intervene in Charlottesville? The Nazis were more heavily armed than they were. Make of that what you will.

  2. So, citizens don’t have a constitutional right to equal protection under law?

    Good Old Dixie, leading the way since 1619.

  3. Avatar for tena tena says:

    That isn’t what equal protection means - it’s not equal physical protection. It’s equal protection from the government under the law.

  4. Yes, but citizens are entitled to physical protection, else why police? I can’t find it now, but back in the Sixties, there was a case where a cop stood by and watched hardhats beat up a hippie. If my memory is ok, the hippie sued and won… but it was a long time ago.

  5. Avatar for tena tena says:

    Yes everyone is entitled to the same treatment by the police.

    There is a partial equal protection argument there, but it’s not based on their physical well-being, really.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

1 more reply

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for sarenarterius Avatar for tena Avatar for captain_america

Continue Discussion