Judge Denies Manafort Request To Wear Suit To All Future Court Hearings

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The judge in Paul Manafort’s Virginia trial denied the former Trump campaign chairman’s request to wear a suit for his next hearing on Oct. 19, and “all subsequent hearings,” arguing that Manafort should be treated no differently than other defendants who are in custody.

“Defendants who are in custody post-conviction are, as a matter of course, not entitled to appear for sentencing or any other hearing in street clothing,” Judge T.S. Ellis wrote in the court order on Tuesday. “This defendant should be treated no differently from other defendants who are in custody post-conviction.”

In the Virginia case, Manafort, who has been in jail since June, was convicted on eight counts of federal financial crimes, with the jury deadlocked on the remaining 10 counts.

The Oct. 19 hearing will focus on Manafort’s decision to strike a deal to cooperate with special counsel Robert Mueller’s team in order to avoid a second trial in Washington, D.C. The judge will assess whether Manfort’s sentencing will be stalled until Manafort is finished cooperating with Mueller. Ellis has called the terms of Manafort’s plea deal — involving the delay of proceedings — “highly unusual.”

Read Ellis’ motion denial below:

Latest News
60
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for erik_t erik_t says:

    Womp womp.

    Maybe prison garb comes in ostrich leather?

  2. Judge: “Only if it is a clown suit.”

  3. Nothing displays this man’s sense of entitlement, and likely that of his peer group, than this request. “Those other defendants aren’t important people like me.” It’s bad enough that they really expect special treatment when convicted of criminal acts but they actually think others, judges for example, will agree with them.

  4. Ellis has called the terms of Manafort’s plea deal — involving the delay of proceedings — “highly unusual.”

    Except they aren't. At all. Someone should provide the judge with a list of cases from the past where this has been done. And then respectfully request that he STFU about it in the future. You know, since he's now holding proof he doesn't know WTF he's talking about.
  5. Still trying to chisel out some tiny piece of the special treatment he thinks he’s entitled to from the adamantine slab of justice that finally fell on him.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

54 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for gelfling545 Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for cervantes Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for kunda311 Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for nobodyforpresident Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for moreyampersand Avatar for tena Avatar for georgeh Avatar for tpr Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for katscherger Avatar for erik_t Avatar for moderately Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for captaintangent Avatar for gilgamesh

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: