Judge Cannon Signals More Delay In MAL Case

Reports from the courthouse say that the judge is likely to hand Trump a win.
Aileen Cannon

After pushing back deadlines in Trump’s Mar-a-Lago prosecution, and leaving room for more delays, the judge in the case is complaining that the former president doesn’t have enough time to prepare for trial.

Per reports from the courthouse, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon for the Southern District of Florida appeared set, following a Wednesday hearing, to further delay Trump’s trial on charges that he retained national defense information at Mar-a-Lago.

Per the Washington Post, Cannon said at the hearing that she was “having a hard time seeing how this work can be accomplished in this compressed time frame.”

Cannon had set a May 2024 trial date for the case, 11 weeks after Trump’s Jan. 6 trial in D.C. is set to begin. Special Counsel Jack Smith has said in filings that he expects to try his case in six weeks.

In spite of that, Cannon reportedly worried at the hearing that the Jan. 6 case would “collide” with the Mar-a-Lago prosecution. Trump’s attorneys have argued at every turn that they’re deprived of the ability to properly defend their client, and need more time. Cannon appears to have used the D.C. prosecution to buttress that argument.

Trump has sought to use delay as his main tactic to defend himself against the two federal cases brought by Smith this year. If he defeats Joe Biden in the presidential election next year, Trump could immediately extinguish both prosecutions.

Cannon has taken her time over the past several months. She gave both parties one month to present arguments over a classified information protective order, a step which typically lasts around one week.

And as Trump’s lawyers have continued to petition her for more delays, Cannon has so far obliged them at least in giving time to consider their arguments while eliding her own role in squeezing the time which lawyers have to prepare in the case.

Trump attorney Todd Blanche reportedly spent around an hour of the two-hour hearing discussing how “voluminous” evidence in the case was while complaining that the Jan. 6 case – which was indicted after the Mar-a-Lago case – had completely changed the task before him.

Federal prosecutor Jay Bratt reportedly suggested to Cannon that changing the Mar-a-Lago trial date based on the Jan. 6 case wouldn’t make sense, in part because the DC dates could also shift.

To that, Cannon purportedly replied: “I’m not quite seeing in your position a level of understanding to these realities.”

Cannon promised a ruling on the schedule soon.

74
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for daled daled says:

    Bought, paid for, and cut from the same delay delay delay cloth, apparently.

  2. Avatar for lestat lestat says:

    I assume Judge Cannon is getting paid by Trump for legal representation, since she is filing and arguing motions for continuance on behalf of the defense.

  3. Oyez oyez! All sit for the dishonorable Loose Cannon!

  4. This has become a joke and a sick one at that.

  5. Everything corrupt here is on wide-screen. People know what justice is worth in this country if they didn’t before. Everything he touches turns to shit.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

68 more replies

Participants

Avatar for daled Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for musgrove Avatar for grandpajoe Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for zlohcuc Avatar for isakindamagic Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for timothytim Avatar for tsp Avatar for wintermoon Avatar for lestat Avatar for rickjones Avatar for brian512 Avatar for tpr Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for 19tibekius6 Avatar for lanabill Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for n_b Avatar for VeganMilitia Avatar for xcopy Avatar for CaptainObvious

Continue Discussion