Jim Jordan Has Some ‘Real Concerns’ About Jan. 6 Committee’s Interest In Him

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 28: Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) wears a mask while listening to testimony from U.S. Attorney General William Barr during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on July 28, 2020 in Washin... WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 28: Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) wears a mask while listening to testimony from U.S. Attorney General William Barr during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on July 28, 2020 in Washington, DC. In his first congressional testimony in more than a year, Barr faced questions from the committee about his deployment of federal law enforcement agents to Portland, Oregon, and other cities in response to Black Lives Matter protests; his role in using federal agents to violently clear protesters from Lafayette Square near the White House last month before a photo opportunity for President Donald Trump in front of a church; his intervention in court cases involving Trump's allies Roger Stone and Michael Flynn; and other issues. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) on Wednesday predictably tensed up when asked about the Jan. 6 committee’s request for information related to the deadly Capitol insurrection.

Appearing on “Fox News Primetime” hours after he received the request, Jordan was asked to comment on it.

“I mean we just got the letter today, Brian,” Jordan replied to guest host Brian Kilmeade. But, he said, he’s “got real concerns” about the committee.

Jordan’s response to Kilmeade’s question was as frantic as other times he’s been asked about his activities on January 6.

“We’re going to review the letter,” he said, “but I gotta be honest with you. I got real concerns about any committee that will take a document and alter it and present it to the American people — completely mislead the American people like they did last week,” Jordan said, appearing to refer to a hearing earlier this month where Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), a member of the committee, read part of a text that an at-the-time unnamed lawmaker had sent to Meadows.

In a chin-scratching defense of Jordan, the right-wing outlet the Federalist soon outed the lawmaker as the sender while simultaneously accusing Schiff of purposefully distorting the text. (The “misrepresentation,” in sum, amounted to changing an em dash to a period.) The outlet also wailed that Schiff had failed to mention that Jordan was not sending his own thoughts on how to subvert the election, he was forwarding along a lawyer’s thoughts.

Shortly after publishing its supposedly groundbreaking revelation, Jordan’s office confirmed to Politico that Jordan was the lawmaker behind the text.

In his response to Kilmeade, Jordan also griped about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) decision to veto an effort by Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to place Jordan and Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN) on the Jan. 6 committee. Both had voted to challenge the certification of Joe Biden’s electoral victory.

Jordan’s latest appearance on Fox News adds to his string of minor freakouts in the past several months whenever he’s asked whether he spoke to Trump on Jan. 6.

Since he first appeared to admit to reporters that he spoke to Trump on the day of the insurrection, Jordan has gone back and forth on whether he did in fact have any conversations with the then-president and, if so, when and how often those talks occurred.

Watch Jordan’s remarks below:

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Sincerely,
TPM Staff
Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: