Jan. 6 Committee Outlines What To Expect From ‘Non-Traditional’ Public Hearings

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 19: U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), chair of the select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol, speaks during a committee business meeting at Cannon House Office Build... WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 19: U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS), chair of the select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol, speaks during a committee business meeting at Cannon House Office Building on Capitol Hill October 19, 2021 in Washington, DC. The committee voted to hold former Trump adviser Stephen Bannon in criminal contempt for refusing to cooperate with the committee’s subpoena. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) MORE LESS

Reps. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) and Adam Schiff (D-CA), both of whom serve on the Jan. 6 committee, on Sunday detailed expectations ahead of the panel’s upcoming public hearings.

Asked about his remarks to CNN last month about the committee having “non-traditional” types of public hearings, Thompson, who chairs the committee, said that the panel is looking to speak to state and local election officials to determine whether the elections were fraudulent. Thompson added that the committee will also talk to some government officials who found nothing wrong with the elections.

“There were some people in the Department of Justice who said to former President Trump that, if you politicize the Department of Justice, we’re not going to leave, because that’s not who we are,” Thompson said. “So, we will look at that and we will talk again to individuals who came to Washington under various circumstances.”

Additionally, Thompson said the committee plans to speak with members of the National Guard who waited more than three hours before they were authorized to assist the Capitol Police and Metropolitan Police on the day of the deadly Capitol insurrection.

Thompson went on to say that the Capitol insurrection was anything but a “comedy of errors” and that the committee’s hearings will determine whether the attack was a “planned effort on the part of certain individuals.”

Schiff, who serves on the committee, told CBS that he hopes that the panel will begin public hearings in a matter of weeks, if not a few months from now.

Schiff said that the committee expects to lay out what it has learned during its investigation thus far about efforts to overturn the election.

According to Schiff, public hearings wouldn’t only address Trump’s election fraud falsehoods, but also efforts by local elections officials and state legislators as well as Justice Department officials to push the Big Lie.

“We hope to be able to tell the story to the country so that they understand it isn’t just about that one day, Jan. 6, but all that led up to it — what happened on that day and the continuing danger going forward,” Schiff said.

Thompson and Schiff’s comments come a week after the Washington Post reported that the committee is set to hold more dramatic presentations during public hearings in the new year as it works to deliver an interim report on the events surrounding the deadly Capitol insurrection by summer.

During a public business meeting held by the committee last month, in the run-up to the House’s vote to hold former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in contempt, the panel revealed a handful of the 9,000 documents and records that Meadows produced in his short-lived engagement with the panel, which demonstrated how there are still many lingering questions about the events of Jan. 6.

The committee’s presentation of some of Meadows’ texts related to his involvement in Trump’s attempts to subvert the election results — which showed an alleged plot to appoint alternate, Trump-friendly slates of electors as early as the day networks called Joe Biden’s presidential victory — offered a preview of the panel’s plans to hold additional, similar public hearings to present the evidence it has gathered.

“We want to tell it from start to finish over a series of weeks, where we can bring out the best witnesses in a way that makes the most sense,” a senior committee aide told the Post last week. “Our legacy piece and final product will be the select committee’s report.”

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: