Jan 6 Panel Subpoenaed Phone Records Of Sebastian Gorka

He's the latest to sue to block a subpoena for his communication records.
Playboy magazine contributor Brian Karem (L) and former Trump deputy assistant Sebastian Gorka (2ndL) argue after the US president delivered remarks on citizenship and the census at the White House in Washington, DC,... Playboy magazine contributor Brian Karem (L) and former Trump deputy assistant Sebastian Gorka (2ndL) argue after the US president delivered remarks on citizenship and the census at the White House in Washington, DC, on July 11, 2019. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) (Photo credit should read BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Jan. 6 Committee issued a subpoena for the phone records of Sebastian Gorka, the bombastic Trump supporter revealed in a federal lawsuit filed on Tuesday.

Gorka said that the panel has not yet asked him directly for any information, but that he received notice from Verizon of a Dec. 15, 2021 subpoena from the committee.

Gorka, who made the leap to the Trump White House in its early days from a position as Breitbart’s national security editor, told that outlet last month that he would launch a “political battle” against the panel over the request.

He’s the latest in a string of Jan. 6 investigation targets who suddenly lawyered up over the past month, fighting subpoenas for their phone records. In many cases, those filing the lawsuits had partly complied with earlier subpoenas for testimony and documents.

Gorka claimed in his lawsuit that his only Jan. 6 involvement was an invitation to appear at a Supreme Court event. TPM first reported last week that Jan. 6 rally planners scheduled an afternoon demonstration outside the Supreme Court before calling it off as the insurrection unfolded.

“Although invited to speak at an event at the Supreme Court that day, his speech was cancelled, and therefore, he only observed the speeches at the Ellipse as one spectator among many and left,” Gorka wrote in the lawsuit.

It’s not clear whether Gorka is referencing that Supreme Court event, though no other events at the high court that day have been reported. Ali Alexander, one of the activists involved in planning events on Jan. 6, had also filed for a permit to hold a small rally on Capitol grounds across the street from the Court.

Gorka argued, with his typical overwrought flourish, that the panel’s request constituted “aimless rifling through the communications records of an adverse political journalist.”

“The toxic forces rending this country apart will only be strengthened, and the goal of more tranquil times will be more elusive, if any party holding a majority of seats in the House of Representatives can hunt down and persecute citizens, including journalists, because of their political sympathies and speech in an effort to silence that speech,” he wrote.

Those suing the committee over the phone subpoenas encompass a broad range of people, including former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Michael Flynn, John Eastman and Alexander. Lower-level organizers of the Jan. 6 rally, including several people listed on permits for events that day, have also filed suit against the phone records subpoenas.

Many of those filing had earlier pledged to cooperate with the panel’s investigation, but now rehash outlandish arguments long-used by former President Trump that Congress has virtually no authority to conduct investigations.

Latest News
209
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. “Journalist”? Like Herr Goebbles?

  2. They’re going after everyone.

  3. Yessssssssssss!!! (Grins and rubs hands maniacally…)

  4. I always thought that Gorka was more Streicher. He lacks Goebbels’s tact and refinement.

  5. If any of these assholes had even so much as an ounce of sense, just an ounce, they’d be fine with their phone records being looked over, because they’d have discussed committing their crimes using burner phones. If nothing else, they should be jailed for being too stupid to know not to take fscking notes on a fscking criminal fscking conspiracy.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

203 more replies

Participants

Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for harry_r_sohl Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for Anarchy_Bunker Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for brian512 Avatar for rhs1963 Avatar for karlwlewis Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for garrybee Avatar for dicktater Avatar for rogerhead Avatar for emiliano4 Avatar for old_guru Avatar for geographyjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: