Ingraham Derides Reparations: ‘No Do-Overs,’ ‘We Won You Lost’

OXON HILL, MD, UNITED STATES - 2018/02/23: Laura Ingraham, American radio host, at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) sponsored by the American Conservative Union held at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in Oxon Hill. (Photo by Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
OXON HILL, MD, UNITED STATES - 2018/02/23: Laura Ingraham, American radio host, at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) sponsored by the American Conservative Union held at the Gaylord National Resort ... OXON HILL, MD, UNITED STATES - 2018/02/23: Laura Ingraham, American radio host, at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) sponsored by the American Conservative Union held at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in Oxon Hill. (Photo by Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Fox News host Laura Ingraham addressed slavery reparations on her podcast Thursday, arguing that the entire world had been remade by “conquest” and that there are “no do-overs” despite liberals’ desire to live in a “fake world.”

“People would argue that the whole world, and I would, the whole world has been reshaped by people taking other people’s land,” Ingraham said. “It’s called conquest.”

“As Trump always says, ‘You don’t get do-overs. No do-overs, that’s it,'” she continued. “There was an argument, sometime, I think it was the 1980s. There was a quote, ‘you won, we lost, that’s that.’ Describing world politics, ‘we won, you lost, that’s that.’ That’s just the way it is.”

She later claimed that her words were being taken out of context.

She was citing a quote referring to a world reshaped by conquest, but was using the argument to bolster her position that reparations are “preposterous.”

Listen here:

Writer Ta-Nehisi Coates appeared before a House subcommittee to speak in favor of reparations on Thursday, sparking the conversation around the issue.

H/T The Daily Beast

Latest News
115
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The slaves lost? Maybe I’m missing something?

  2. At least she’s consistent. This was exactly how she felt when Obama won. She was all in on working with, and encouraging Repugnants to work with the winning party. No hypocrisy to see here at all.

  3. Who’s the “we” here? White people? But which white people? Certainly not southern white people.

    Can we go back to racist talking points that make at least a modicum of sense?

  4. I do nazi the logic in her argument.

    She’s a loathsome individual.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

109 more replies

Participants

Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for UnfadingGreen Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for cervantes Avatar for boscobrown Avatar for tfistbmpr Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for quin Avatar for sanni Avatar for ottnott Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for sjay1956 Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for katscherger Avatar for drtv Avatar for skeptical Avatar for outis Avatar for shannon_spencer_fox Avatar for jackofalltirades

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: