Illinois GOP Lawmaker Wins Temporary Exemption From Stay At Home Order — For Himself

Rep. Darren Bailey talks on the House floor at the Illinois State Capitol in Springfield, Feb. 20, 2019. (E. Jason Wambsgans/Chicago Tribune/TNS)
Rep. Darren Bailey talks on the House floor at the Illinois State Capitol in Springfield, Feb. 20, 2019. (E. Jason Wambsgans/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A Republican Illinois lawmaker won a temporary exemption from Gov. J. B. Pritzker’s (D) stay-at-home order Tuesday — but only for himself. 

Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul filed a speedy appeal asking an appellate court to reverse and vacate the decision Tuesday, after Pritzker promised a legal battle during his Monday press conference.

“In collaboration with the Attorney General’s office, my team and I will fight this legal battle to the furthest extent possible to ensure that public health and common sense prevail,” the governor said.

Echoing conservative complaints nationwide, Rep. Darren Bailey (R), a freshman representing a rural district in southern Illinois, sued the governor in state circuit court for alleged misuse of his emergency powers. 

In his complaint, Bailey’s lawyers said that Pritzker declared a public health emergency due to the coronavirus pandemic on March 9. At that point, the governor was imbued with certain powers under the state’s Emergency Management Agency Act, including his authority to issue a stay-at-home order. The Act grants him such powers for not more than 30 days. 

On March 20, Pritzker announced the statewide stay-at-home order. Since then, he has declared Illinois in a state of continued disaster, and extended the order — a move that Bailey argued was illegal and outside the bounds of the governor’s emergency powers. 

“Pritzker is issuing redundant proclamations acknowledging the same COVID-19 virus as a ‘continuing disaster,’ wherein he is reenergizing the emergency provisions of the act for the sole purpose of rendering the statutory 30-day limitation placed on his emergency powers meaningless,” the lawsuit said.

Bailey sought a temporary restraining order and injunction to relieve him from having to stay home and limit his own travel within the state. 

He was granted both by Clay County Circuit Court Judge Michael McHaney on Monday. 

“Plaintiff has shown he has a clearly ascertainable right in need of immediate protection, namely his liberty interest to be free from Pritzker’s executive order of quarantine in his own home,” wrote the judge in his order. 

Pritzker had strong words for the decision on Monday when he promised the coming appeal.

“History will remember those who put politics aside to come together to keep people safe,” he said. “It will also remember those so blindly devoted to ideology and the pursuit of personal celebrity that they made an enemy of science and of reason.”

The legal action mirrors sentiment shared nationwide by conservatives chafing under restrictions governors put in place to slow the spread of coronavirus. In a similar legal action, Wisconsin legislators sued the state’s top health officials in state Supreme Court last week for extending the stay-at-home order. Elsewhere, individuals have sued their governors or organized demonstrations to express their anger. President Donald Trump has already promised that he was “going to come down strong” on states enforcing “too tough” of restrictions.

And on Monday, Attorney General William Barr issued a memo telling federal prosecutors to be on the lookout for any state restrictions that might infringe on constitutional rights.

Read the judge’s order here:

Latest News
65
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for tsp tsp says:

    The GOP is nothing if they can’t be victims…of common sense…that infringes on their ideology.

  2. Echoing conservative complaints nationwide, Rep. Darren Bailey (R), a freshman representing a rural district in southern Illinois, sued the governor in state circuit court for alleged misuse of his emergency powers.

    Not surprisingly, at the same time GOP state legislators are claiming they can sue state executives on these matters, the GOP is arguing that Congress can’t sue Trump on the same matters.

    You’re not a Republican unless you’re a hypocritical, self-contradictory dirt-bag.

  3. This is actually an interesting case. State law limits the emergency powers to 30 days.

    Clearly, they never anticipated that a given disaster would exceed that, thus the constraints.

    I’m actually on board with this as a lawsuit, we can’t just ignore laws willy-nilly out there. They should be getting their legislatures back into emergency sessions if needed to fix the laws, not go and do things by fiat.

  4. I know it’s not just me…but DAMMIT I am SICK of these whining and sniveling aholes insisting that they are such VICTIMS.

  5. I’m fine with this.

    But only so long as when the inevitable infection hits him, he stays home and doesn’t tax the health care system because he’s stupid.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

59 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for ajm Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for becca656 Avatar for dont Avatar for bethinor Avatar for alansnipes734 Avatar for ottnott Avatar for martinstett Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for pine Avatar for hornblower Avatar for reggid Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tsp Avatar for edhedh Avatar for noonm Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for nycabj Avatar for maximus Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for trustywoods Avatar for rucleare

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: