House Votes To Decriminalize Marijuana But Measure Has No Chance In Senate

FILE - In this Aug. 15, 2019 file photo, marijuana grows at an indoor cannabis farm in Gardena, Calif. Top prosecutors in the vast majority of Arizona counties are dropping all existing possession of marijuana cases ... FILE - In this Aug. 15, 2019 file photo, marijuana grows at an indoor cannabis farm in Gardena, Calif. Top prosecutors in the vast majority of Arizona counties are dropping all existing possession of marijuana cases even before a new voter-approved law eliminating criminal penalties for having small amounts of the drug takes effect when results of the Nov. 3, 2020 election are certified. An Associated Press survey of county attorneys received responses from 13 of 15 elected county attorneys, all of whom said they were either immediately dropping existing cases or in one case pausing prosecutions and planning to drop them when Proposition 207 goes into effect. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Democratic-controlled House on Friday approved a bill to decriminalize and tax marijuana at the federal level. The bill would reverse what supporters called a failed policy of criminalization of pot use and take steps to address racial disparities in enforcement of federal drug laws.

Opponents, mostly Republicans, called the bill a hollow political gesture and mocked Democrats for bringing it up at a time when thousands of Americans are dying from the coronavirus pandemic.

Supporters say it would help reverse adverse effects of the decades-long “war on drugs” by removing marijuana, or cannabis, from the list of federally controlled substances while allowing states to set their own rules on pot. The bill also would use money from an excise tax on marijuana to address the needs of groups and communities harmed by the drug war and provide for the expungement of federal marijuana convictions and arrests.

“For far too long, we have treated marijuana as a criminal justice problem instead of as a matter of personal choice and public health,” said Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and a key sponsor of the bill. “Whatever one’s views are on the use of marijuana for recreational or medicinal use, the policy of arrests, prosecution and incarceration at the federal level has proven unwise and unjust.”

The vote comes at a time when most Americans live in states where marijuana is legal in some form, and lawmakers from both parties agreed that national cannabis policy has lagged woefully behind changes at the state level. That divide has created a host of problems — loans and other banking services, for example, are hard to get for many marijuana companies because pot remains illegal at the federal level.

The bill also would open up more opportunities for marijuana businesses, including access to Small Business Administration loans to help ensure that minorities can take part in an industry dominated by white famers and growers.

The bill, which passed 228-164, now goes to the Republican-controlled Senate, where it is unlikely to advance. A related bill that would give pot businesses access to traditional banking services has languished in the Senate after being approved by the House last year.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. It’s outrageous that the Senate would be obstructionists on this when the national need for marijuana has never been more dire.

  2. Republicans policy, outdated, what a shock.

  3. Avatar for pine pine says:

    " But Measure Has No Chance In Senate"

    That should be a banner hung in the Senate chambers as long as McConnell is leader.

  4. Measure Has No Chance In Senate

    No doubt a headline we’ll see a few thousand times in the next few years.

  5. Avatar for dwward dwward says:

    you would think that a handful of libertarian leaning Republicans would be pretty easy to get onboard. I’d think Rand Paul would co-sponsor. I guess I shouldn’t assume every red state Democrat would sign up, but I really don’t think many people care about this any longer.

    I’m guessing the banking lobby would sign up.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

86 more replies

Participants

Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for dwward Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for cervantes Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for irasdad Avatar for slagathor Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for pine Avatar for schmed Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for greysea Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for timorwig Avatar for greenman66 Avatar for kenga Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for haddockbranzini Avatar for staggerlee Avatar for Mikebeee

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: