House Passes Bill To Restore Obama-Era ‘Net Neutrality’ Rules

FILE- In this June 19, 2018, file photo a router and internet switch are displayed in East Derry, N.H. Net neutrality traces back to an engineering maxim called the “end-to-end principle,” a self-regulating network that put control in the hands of end users rather than a central authority. Traditional cable-TV services, for instance, required special equipment and controlled what channels are shown on TV. With an end-to-end network like the internet, the types of equipment, apps, articles and video services permitted are limited only to imagination. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)
FILE- In this June 19, 2018, file photo a router and internet switch are displayed in East Derry, N.H. The House has passed a bill to restore Obama-era “net neutrality” rules, but the legislation may die in the R... FILE- In this June 19, 2018, file photo a router and internet switch are displayed in East Derry, N.H. The House has passed a bill to restore Obama-era “net neutrality” rules, but the legislation may die in the Republican-controlled Senate. The Save the Internet Act passed the Democrat-controlled House 232-190, largely on party lines. But top Senate Republican Mitch McConnell said Tuesday, April 10, 2019, that net neutrality is “dead on arrival in the Senate.” (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The House has passed bill Wednesday to restore Obama-era “net neutrality” rules, but the legislation faces slim odds of making it through the Republican-controlled Senate.

The Save the Internet Act passed the Democrat-controlled House 232-190 Wednesday, with only one Republican vote in favor. But top Senate Republican Mitch McConnell said Tuesday that net neutrality is “dead on arrival in the Senate.” The Trump administration also opposes the bill . Still, the effort to restore net neutrality could give Democrats political points on consumer protections.

The 2015 net neutrality regulations barred internet service providers like Comcast, Verizon and AT&T from blocking or slowing online traffic or from charging companies for faster lanes for consumers. They were highly partisan in Washington and came after a decade of telecom-industry resistance.

They were upheld by a federal appeals court, but the Federal Communications Commission scrapped the rules after the Trump administration installed a Republican majority there. That meant there was nothing stopping ISPs from interfering with internet traffic so long as they disclosed it.

The net-neutrality saga continued as tech companies and nearly two dozen U.S. states sued to undo the 2017 repeal and restore the 2015 measure. A decision by a federal appeals court on that is pending. California also has a net-neutrality law which is on hold until the appeals court decision.

In Congress, Republicans have introduced three other bills that net-neutrality advocates say are too weak because they don’t give the FCC the power to go after potential bad behavior by ISPs aside from blocking, throttling and charging internet companies for zippier access to users.

Latest News
13
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The yellow cables need to be replaced ASAP.

  2. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    The contrast with the GOP passing symbolic bills is that this one, if enacted, would be a good thing rather than a complete clusterfsck. I look forward to a revived version passing the senate.

  3. The purpose of passing bills like these that will certainly fail in the Senate, bills that are clearly good for citizens, is simply to use it as election talking points. Get the Republicans in Congress on record voting against these things.

  4. There are slim odds that Yertle will even allow this bill to come up for a vote. I’m sure he’s enriched himself with plenty of donations from the cable companies and he never bites the hand that feeds him. He really needs to be defeated in 2020, along with the traitor he’s aiding and abetting.

  5. I find it beyond belief ludicrous that the dotard is accusing the investigators of Russian attacks on our elections of treason?

    Attacks confirmed by repeatedly by our intelligence agencies.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

7 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for robg Avatar for fgs Avatar for epicurus Avatar for wanderer Avatar for ottnott Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for twowolves Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for aiddon

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: