House Passes Obama’s ‘Fast Track’ Trade Deal

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. reflects on the Supreme Court decision upholding the Affordable Care Act, during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 28, 2012. Pelosi, the form... House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. reflects on the Supreme Court decision upholding the Affordable Care Act, during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 28, 2012. Pelosi, the former speaker of the House, was instrumental in helping to pass health care reform in Congress and was at President Obama's side when he signed it into law. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

UPDATE: June 18, 2015, 1:11 PM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — Working closely with the White House, the Republican-controlled House revived President Barack Obama’s trade agenda on Thursday, voting to strengthen his hand in global negotiations and clearing the way for a showdown in the Senate.

The 218-208 vote marked the first step in a bipartisan rescue operation mounted in the week since labor-backed Democrats in the House rebelled against the president and derailed the legislation he seeks. Additionally, a companion bill to provide federal aid for workers harmed by imports awaits action in both houses in the coming days.

“Ninety-five percent of the world’s consumers don’t live in America, they live in other countries,” said Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, Republican point man in the effort to push bipartisan trade bills across the finish line. “And if we want to make more things here and sell them there then we need to tear down those trade barriers that make them more expensive.”

Democrats fought the legislation, as they have for months, for fear it would lead to the loss of U.S. jobs overseas. “Let’s kill this donkey once and for all,” said Rep. Donna Edwards, D-Md.

The administration’s immediate negotiating objective is a round of talks involving 12 countries in Asia, North America and South America.

The vote was close but not suspenseful to give Obama the ability to approve trade deals that Congress can accept or reject, but not change. A total of 28 Democrats supported the legislation, the same number as on an initial vote last week. Other recent presidents have had the same prerogative Obama seeks, known as “fast-track.”

Even so, obstacles remain to completion of a plan that Obama, Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell hope will send two bills to the White House by the end of next week.

The next test comes in the Senate, where support of a dozen or so pro-trade Democrats will be required to approve the stand-alone measure to enhance Obama’s negotiating authority without knowing for certain that the aid for displaced workers will also make it to the president’s desk.

Next, first the Senate, then the House, must pass the aid package itself. Normally, that measure would be assured of gaining overwhelming Democratic support. But in this case, opponents of the trade measure have targeted it for defeat in hopes of killing the entire package.

Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader, told reporters she doesn’t “see a path right now” for the aid package to pass, comments likely to reinforce whatever reluctance pro-trade Democrats have about putting their votes behind a stand-alone trade bill.

Boehner was quick to disagree, and said so. As for Pelosi, he said, “I think I’ll just keep my comments to myself with regard to how I feel about the leader’s actions.”

Pelosi worked closely with Boehner last week in what had appeared to be an attempt on her part to clear a way for passage of the legislation, but joined the revolt just before a showdown on the floor.

This time, the White House, Boehner and McConnell hoped to work around her.

“We are committed to ensuring both … get votes in the House and Senate and are sent to the president for signature,” Boehner and McConnell said in a joint statement issued Wednesday in an attempt to reassure pro-trade Democrats whose votes will be needed.

Supporters of the president’s agenda argue that the United States must stay involved in international trade, in part because otherwise, countries like China will write the rules to their own advantage.

Organized labor and other opponents of international trade deals say they cost thousands of American workers their jobs by shifting employment to foreign countries with low wages, poor working conditions and lax environmental standards.

Obama has not spoken in public in the past two days about the attempt to resurrect his trade bills, nor have WhiteHouse officials disclosed many details of his role in putting together the rescue attempt. McConnell and Boehner both said on Tuesday that they had spoken with the president on the phone, but they offered little by way of details.

Presidential spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at the White House on Wednesday, “The only legislative strategy that the president can support is one that will result in both pieces of legislation arriving at his desk.”

___

AP reporters Erica Werner and Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this story.

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Latest News
100
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I love how our “Democratic President” continues to screw us with his insane need to come to a Grand Bargain with the enemy. He’s the biggest goddamned political disappointment in the 50 years I have been personally involved with politics.

  2. What a disappointment. Still better than the Clown Car on the other side but we still get screwed.

  3. Gee, I thought Obama was humiliated, slammed, in lame-duck land, rejected etc. with the stunning rejection last week.

    Could it be we’re still horse trading and making sausages?

  4. changed my mind

  5. NOT ONE MORE DIME TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FROM ME.

    They don’t represent me. I have never seen a trade deal that helped the middle class. Canada, Germany, Japan, all have laws that protect their Workers. Not the US

    My first trade Readjustment Allowance was in 1977. Finally with all the plants in my county, that employed Tens of thousands of workers gone, I had to retire at 57.

    AND Obama is certainly one of the worst negotiators I have ever seen, he even seems to have started to drink the Trade Kool-Aid. All the lies to smooth things over.

    I now know that Bernie Sanders is the only hope

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

94 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for dolono Avatar for chammy Avatar for trippin Avatar for tcinla Avatar for condew Avatar for kevinschmidt Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for chuck_voellinger Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for notborneveryminute Avatar for boidster Avatar for kdnicewanger Avatar for martinheldt Avatar for daveg000 Avatar for thomasmatthew Avatar for josephp55 Avatar for carlkirsch Avatar for msedlis

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: