House Intel Republicans Have Been Ditching Committee Sessions For Months

House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) speaks with Republican Representative from Ohio Jim Jordan (R-OH) during a hearing as part of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump in Wash... House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA) speaks with Republican Representative from Ohio Jim Jordan (R-OH) during a hearing as part of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump in Washington,DC on November 20, 2019. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images) MORE LESS

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee have barely been showing up at the committee’s virtual sessions ever since COVID-19 outbreak forced Congress to shut down the U.S. Capitol building in early March.

Since then, Republicans have only participated in one committee meeting out of least seven meetings. According to Politico, the only time a Republican attended a session was on April 28, when now-Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe (R-TX) appeared at a roundtable shortly before his Senate nomination hearing.

Committee chair Adam Schiff (D-CA) told Politico on Monday that the Republicans’ absences are “almost counterproductive on their part.”

“It seems rather childish but I hope that they will reconsider,” he said.

Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT), another member of the committee, described his GOP colleagues’ refusal to participate as a partisan stunt brought on by the committee’s contentious impeachment process last year.

“They have their grievances, right?” he told Politico.

Two of the committee’s Republicans, Reps. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) and Chris Stewart (R-CT), claimed it’s about cybersecurity, not politics, and therefore the GOP would only be attending the sessions if they were held in-person.

“These things get hacked,” Wenstrup said in an interview with Politico. “Why are we putting ourselves at that risk? You border on classified information and maybe sometimes even spill into it. It’s just not the way to conduct business.”

“It’s not an organized effort at all. I would just say that we have concerns about the format,” Stewart said.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Sincerely,
TPM Staff
Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: