WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democrats, feeling pressure to display their vision for border security, are preparing a package that would ignore President Donald Trump’s demand for $5.7 billion for a wall with Mexico and would instead pay for other ideas aimed at protecting the border.
As the government slogged through a record 33rd day of its partial shutdown Wednesday, details of Democrats’ border security plan and its cost remained a work in progress, though some said it might match Trump’s $5.7 billion figure. Party leaders said it would include money for scanning devices and other technological tools for improving security at ports of entry and along the boundary, plus funds for more border agents and immigration judges.
“If his $5.7 billion is about border security, then we see ourselves fulfilling that request, only doing it with what I like to call using a smart wall,” said No. 3 House Democratic leader Jim Clyburn, D-S.C.
Democrats’ movement toward producing a plan, which they said they expected to unveil this week, was significant because it underscored a growing uneasiness with letting Trump cast them as soft on border security. It came as the Senate prepared for Thursday votes on rival plans for reopening federal agencies and paying 800,000 federal workers who are days from missing yet another paycheck.
Republicans would couple ending the shutdown with financing Trump’s wall and revamping immigration laws. Democrats would reopen agency doors through Feb. 8 while bargainers seek an accord.
Both faced likely defeat, but that might spur the two sides into a more serious effort to strike a compromise when each saw it lacked the votes to prevail. Both proposals would need 60 votes to pass in a chamber with 53-47 Republican control.
Ominously, the day’s signs pointed to continued partisan hostilities.
Trump told White House reporters that Democrats had become “radicalized” and “a very, very dangerous party,” and took personal aim at Congress’ top two Democrats. He said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is “very strongly dominated” by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, calling him her “puppet.”
Schumer, D-N.Y., called on Senate Republicans to abandon Trump despite his sway with conservative voters, saying, “I know that President Trump has some power in these Republican primaries, but sometimes you have to rise to the occasion.”
A poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research released Wednesday was the latest indicator that the shutdown is hurting Trump with the general public. While his approval among Republicans remains strong, just 34 percent of Americans like his performance as president and 6 in 10 assign a great deal of responsibility to him for the shutdown, around double the share blaming Democrats.
The Senate GOP bill would temporarily shield from deportation 700,000 “Dreamers,” migrants who arrived in the U.S. illegally as children, protections Trump has tried terminating. He’s also offered temporary protections for people who fled violence or natural disasters in several countries — another program Trump has curtailed.
Democrats have objected to other provisions making it harder for Central American minors to gain asylum in the U.S.
The testy relationship between Trump and Pelosi, D-Calif., decayed further when she informed him he couldn’t use the House chamber for his planned State of the Union address next Tuesday. She invited him to speak “when government has been opened.”
Trump said he’d plan an event elsewhere and called Pelosi’s move “a great blotch on the country” that showed she didn’t want “the truth” about border security. But late Wednesday night he tweeted that he would postpone the address until after the shutdown had ended, saying no other venue could match the House chamber.
The clash over the speech suggested that a collaborative atmosphere that could facilitate a shutdown deal wasn’t at hand.
Democratic leaders have insisted they won’t negotiate with Trump on border security unless he reopens the government. Trump has said he’ll end the shutdown only if Congress provides money for the wall, though White House officials have indicated he’s open to counteroffers.
Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., has urged the White House to provide green cards to 700,000 Dreamers as a way to break the impasse. Lankford has mentioned this to White House adviser Jared Kushner, said a person familiar with the conversations who wasn’t authorized to speak publicly.
With Democrats eager to show they’re trying to end the impasse, the House used mostly party-line votes Wednesday to approve one measure reopening government agencies through February. By a similar tally, the chamber voted to finance most shuttered agencies through September.
Growing numbers of House Democrats say the party should show where it stands on border security.
“Right now it’s a vacuum and the president is offering fake plans to stop drug smuggling,” said Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore. Offering a Democratic alternative “helps the possibility of beginning a real negotiation,” he said.
Their proposal is expected to exceed the $1.6 billion Trump initially sought for the wall before upping his request.
I really wish the Democrats would have held a hearing on this. Brought in experts to discuss what has and has not worked on boarder security. Argued that what Trump is demanding - without hearing and analysis is not only racist, but INEFFECTIVE.
However, this is the next best approach. The democrats can’t be tagged as for “open boarders”, so they need a plan they can say involves “smart spending to strengthen our nations system of boarder security” not a “wasteful political wall”
And I would even say that the price tag for the entire thing ought to be $5.7B, but with tight strings so that none of it can be used for (a) removals of people long in the US/dreamers/parents of American citizens, (b) a wall, or © separating children from their parents.
It certainly sounds like Clyburn and others are sure coming close to capitulation with an agreement to provide $5.7 billion and somehow earmark it for Non-Wall purposes. What would be the method of preventing Trump from using it as he pleases? This is too scary a notion. I am just hopeful Democrats do not do what has become typical for my party; get cold feet when success is about to open the door.
Every bill, including that before the shutdown, has had “extra” money for border security. Chuck and Nancy and Mitch had agreed on $1.6B and that figure was in the earlier bills. The bill just says what it is to be used for, and expressly states what it CAN’T be used for. That is a law, Trump can’t ignore it. This is what was done with the 2017 and 2018 funding bills.
I am just ambivalent about another authorization for billions when the other 1.6 has not been touched. Trump can keep demanding more and Congress authorizing drip-by-drip until he gets to 5.7 or more- Just to see if he can force it out of the Treasury. Democrats would/could show muscle by including in any bill that previously authorized funds must be spent before any other will be allocated; their poison pill.
“If his $5.7 billion is about border security, then we see ourselves fulfilling that request, only doing it with what I like to call using a smart wall,” said No. 3 House Democratic leader Jim Clyburn, D-S.C.
And…just what in-the-h@ll is a Smart-Wall? It’s either a wall or it’s not. This. Is. What. Scares. Me,