Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) on Sunday expressed that both she and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden are not taking the possibility of Russian interference in the November election lightly.
When asked about the intelligence bulletin released by the Department of Homeland Security on Friday — which warns that Russia is seeking “to undermine public trust in the electoral process” by spreading baseless claims that mail-in ballots will lead to voter fraud, echoing President Trump’s and Attorney General Bill Barr’s unfounded assertions on the matter — Harris told CNN that she doesn’t doubt the possibility of Russia interference costing Biden and her the election.
In mentioning how she is “clear” that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election, Harris cited her position on the Senate Intelligence Committee and the panel’s detailed reports supporting her assertion before going onto argue that Russia “will be at the front of the line” regarding foreign interference in the 2020 election.
Asked whether Russian interference could lead to the Biden-Harris campaign losing in November, Biden’s running mate replied “theoretically, of course, yes.”
Harris went on to mention voter suppression issues, such as the 2013 Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder that she said “gutted” the Voting Rights Act.
Harris also slammed Trump’s efforts to “convince” voters to have distrust in the integrity of the election system and “compromise in their belief that their vote might actually count.”
Harris added that both she and Biden are “very realistic” about how “there will be many obstacles that people are intentionally placing in front of Americans’ ability to vote.”
“But we will surpass and surmount and get around those obstacles,” Harris said.
Watch Harris’ remarks below:
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA): "Theoretically, of course" Russian interference could cost Biden the election pic.twitter.com/uIA54jIOhz
— Talking Points Memo (@TPM) September 6, 2020
Just like it did for Hillary.
The good news is that, at least no one is denying Russian interference or its significance this time around. Does anyone remember this headline from the NYT on November 1, 2016:
It was our denial of the Russian interference four years ago that allowed it to be so effective (IMO).
The headline doesn’t match the quote.
She says “theoretically” Russian interference could decide the election, not just threaten it.
She also says she and Joe will “surmount” all obstacles.
Stick it to him, Kamala!
Ahhh ! A VP who can actually articulate their own thoughts and provide information without continual messages of loyalty and subservience to their lord and master. Looking forward to her term !
It’s so refreshing, so adult, you might say, to hear someone acknowledge she faces a potential problem. I’m so truly sick of this macho posturing where you’ll crush your enemies’ skulls like grapes etc. etc. This is a truly strong person saying she doesn’t control everything, and things could go wrong. I never imagined how much I could appreciate hearing that.