GOPers Repeat Calls For Biden Testimony As Dems Debunk Conspiracy Theories

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 22: Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) talks with reporters in during a recess in the impeachment trial at the U.S. Capitol on January 22, 2020 in Washington, DC. The Senate impeachment trial of President ... WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 22: Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) talks with reporters in during a recess in the impeachment trial at the U.S. Capitol on January 22, 2020 in Washington, DC. The Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump, which started Tuesday, resumes today and is expected to last three to five more weeks. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A focus by House impeachment managers on debunking the Ukraine conspiracy theories President Trump has pushed collided this week with a growing push by Senate Republicans to call witnesses like Joe Biden, ostensibly to litigate those very theories.

A spotlight on the former vice president and 2020 contender is precisely what Trump wanted when he pressured the Ukrainian government to announce investigations into the Bidens — the very alleged abuse of power that lead to Trump’s impeachment.

House Democrats have made a significant part of their case explaining why Trump’s Biden obsession was motivated by electoral concerns — and Republicans have taken the opportunity to argue that calling Joe and Hunter Biden as witnesses is now fair game.

“If we’re going to call witnesses, I think it’s now clear we absolutely must call Hunter Biden, and we probably need to call Joe Biden,” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) told reporters Thursday.

“I think they’ve raised the issue, frankly, to a higher level than it was intended to be, than it would have been, probably, going into this,” Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) told reporters Wednesday.

When TPM asked why it took Republicans years to question Biden’s supposed corruption in Ukraine, if it was so obviously troubling years ago, Cramer pointed to the new leadership in Ukraine.

“A couple of years ago, we didn’t have a new president of Ukraine that ran on an anti-corruption platform,” he said. “So now there’s perhaps an opportunity that there wasn’t prior to that election.”

Whether the Biden angle becomes part of the Senate trial, Cramer said, “remains to be seen. But I was a little bit surprised at how much attention it got from the managers today. It’s not necessary to acquit the President, but it may help exonerate him.”

Trump’s personal lawyer Jay Sekulow played coy Wednesday when reporters brought up Republicans’ interest in hearing from the Bidens. The President’s legal team, he said, would wait to see the full House case before settling on its response.

Some Democrats have reportedly floated having Joe or Hunter Biden testify in exchange for the testimony of key Trump administration witnesses. Joe Biden, for his part, has said he’d refuse to be a party to such a trade. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) pushed back on the plan on Thursday, as have the House managers themselves.

Republicans, nonetheless, have argued that House managers’ own trial strategy makes the Bidens relevant. “It begs questions like, does that mean the Bidens are completely off limits, to where you couldn’t even touch it?” Sen. Mike Braun (R-IN) said Thursday.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said the managers made a “very serious strategic error” by involving the Bidens.

“It is directly relevant, I got to say, the need for the Senate to hear the testimony of Hunter Biden,” Cruz said, adding: “The House Democrats have now made Hunter Biden central to the question of the President’s interests.”

Latest News
63
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. This will go very much like the proverbial dog that chases the car.

    What happens once the dog catches the car?

  2. Here, fishie fishie fishie…

  3. No, the Bidens aren’t relevant to the question of if Trump tried to interfere in the 2020 election and why he held Ukrainian aid illegally. They know nothing about that, and if the president’s attorneys want to argue about corruption in Ukraine then they should be addressing working with people like Lutsenko and Firtash long before worrying about Hunter Biden sitting on a board.

    This is why the president’s counsel will not present a long, involved case…they have none, and they don’t want to state lies about the Bidens or House investigation for too long. And, if they really get the Bidens on the stand, Schiff will completely eviscerate their case and show it for the sham it is. It’s just a distraction from Trump’s illegal and immoral behavior, and it’s really the only way they can hope to get this over on America.

  4. Avatar for wseitz wseitz says:

    Prefer him as a candidate or not, Biden should agree to testify and turn it into a giant campaign commerical, while simultaneously telling the house managers on team Trump to go screw themselves. It could win him the election.

  5. Braun

    “A couple of years ago, we didn’t have a new president of Ukraine that ran on an anti-corruption platform,” he said. “So now there’s perhaps an opportunity that there wasn’t prior to that election.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

57 more replies

Participants

Avatar for discobot Avatar for butlerknights Avatar for oscarhomolka Avatar for rollinnolan Avatar for inversion Avatar for sniffit Avatar for drriddle Avatar for lastroth Avatar for gr Avatar for martinheldt Avatar for dangoodbar Avatar for commanderogg Avatar for pshah Avatar for slimjim33 Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for tena Avatar for albesure Avatar for caltg Avatar for onemorepoint Avatar for noonm Avatar for cub_calloway Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for txlawyer Avatar for ldcolton

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: