GOP Approved Footing Up To $1.6 Million Of Trump’s Legal Fees To Fight NY Probes

DES MOINES, IOWA - OCTOBER 09: Former President Donald Trump speaks to supporters during a rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on October 09, 2021 in Des Moines, Iowa. This is Trump's first rally in Iowa since the 20... DES MOINES, IOWA - OCTOBER 09: Former President Donald Trump speaks to supporters during a rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on October 09, 2021 in Des Moines, Iowa. This is Trump's first rally in Iowa since the 2020 election. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The GOP reportedly agreed to fund up to $1.6 million of former President Trump’s legal bills to fight probes into his business practices in New York, according to the Washington Post.

The Post reported that the party’s executive committee overwhelmingly approved the payments during a meeting last summer in Nashville, indicating that the GOP’s vow to fund Trump’s personal legal fees is 10 times higher than previously known.

Last month, the GOP claimed in campaign-finance filings that it paid the former president’s personal attorneys $121,670 in October. According to the Post, the party has issued more payments since then with the RNC paying $578,000 last month to attorneys representing both Trump and his businesses.

The payments are reportedly expected to continue in the next several months, and the executive committee could move to fund more than $1.6 million in Trump’s legal bills.

The RNC’s funding of up to $1.6 million of Trump’s legal fees is meant to fund Trump’s defense against two investigations of his business: a civil investigation by New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) as well as a criminal probe by James and Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance (D).

“The RNC’s Executive Committee approved paying for certain legal expenses that relate to politically motivated legal proceedings waged against President Trump,” Emma Vaughn, a GOP spokeswoman, told the Post in a statement Thursday. “As a leader of our party, defending President Trump and his record of achievement is critical to the GOP.”

According to the Post, the RNC’s first payments in October went to Ronald Fischetti, who has served as Trump’s personal lawyer in the New York investigations.

On Thursday, the RNC told the Post that it paid Fischetti again last month, in addition to two new law firms, which include the firm of Susan Necheles, who was listed as an attorney for Trump’s longtime chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg and two Trump corporate entities when indicted by Vance on tax fraud charges last summer.

The Post also reported that the RNC said it paid the law firm of Michael van der Veen, a Philadelphia-based personal injury and defense lawyer who served as part of Trump’s defense team in his second impeachment trial earlier this year for “incitement of insurrection.”

GOP officials privately say that the former president is the biggest fundraising draw for the party, and they hope to maintain a good rapport with him heading into next year’s midterm elections and before the 2024 presidential election, according to the Post. Trump advisers say that RNC chair Ronna McDaniel is regularly in touch with the former president and has urged him against starting a third party.

Although some members have demanded for the GOP be more independent from Trump, a large majority of the party’s 168-member committee continues to back the former president, according to the Post.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Only TFG could turn getting sued into another chance to chisel and grift.

  2. . . . Record of achievement?
    I didn’t see the DNC paying for Clinton’s legal fees re: Monica.
    I didn’t see the DNC funding Hillary’s server responses.

  3. Avatar for Kiki Kiki says:

    Are random cash flows into and out of RNC coffers completely free of campaign finance laws? This makes sense for the RNC business-wise but is it legal for RNC to pay Drump’s random personal expenses?

  4. I bet the entire GOP is afraid of what might happen if they refuse to pay his ‘personal’ lawyer bills.
    Second bet: those lawyers would not get paid otherwise.

  5. Third bet: those lawyers refused to take the cases unless the RNC committed to backstopping the payments.

Continue the discussion at

74 more replies


Avatar for discobot Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for thehatter Avatar for sysprog Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for eldonlazar Avatar for globalguy Avatar for teenlaqueefa Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for lastroth Avatar for alyoshakaramazov1 Avatar for pastor_agnostic Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah Avatar for jim195 Avatar for rocklaverve Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for maximus Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for autumnwinds Avatar for slowrichard Avatar for VeganMilitia Avatar for PrimeTime

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: