GOP Predictably Attempts To Derail Impeachment Vote With Procedural Gunk

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 13: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) talks to reporters during a news conference following a GOP caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol Visitors Center February 13, 2019 in Washington... WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 13: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) talks to reporters during a news conference following a GOP caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol Visitors Center February 13, 2019 in Washington, DC. McCarthy said that he supports the framework of a bipartisan spending deal that would avert another partial federal government shutdown but is waiting to read the bill before deciding on whether he would vote for it. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) MORE LESS

House Republicans reportedly told Democrats ahead of Wednesday’s impeachment vote proceedings that they’d limit their procedural objections in exchange for an extra hour of debate time. But that didn’t stop House Republican leadership from using the first hour of proceedings to make dense and often murky procedural protests, while accusing Democratic leadership of intentionally violating House rules.

Just as proceedings kicked off, Rep. Andrew Biggs (R-AZ) immediately addressed Speaker Pro Tempore Diana DeGette (D-CO) and filed a motion to adjourn “so we can stop wasting America’s time on impeachment.”

DeGette called for an oral vote on adjournment, ruling the majority Democrats had the vote, but Biggs insisted on a slower, recorded vote. That pattern continued among Republicans for the next hour.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) attempted to submit a resolution to the record shortly thereafter, a document that accused House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler (D-NY) and House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff (D-CA) of “intentionally” violating rules of the House by “abusing and exceeding their powers as chairmen” throughout the entirety of the impeachment inquiry. The lengthy resolution criticized everything from Schiff’s handling of the whistleblower’s complaint to Nadler’s allowance of only one minority witness during the Judiciary’s hearing. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) called for a vote to reject McCarthy’s objection. While Democrats clearly had the votes to table it, McCarthy followed Biggs’ lead and requested a recorded vote.

House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) made one more procedural objection before the floor opened for six hours of debate, raising a point of order against House Rules Committee Chair James McGovern’s (D-MA) attempt to officially open impeachment proceedings. Scalise argued the majority had committed a procedural failure by not allowing the minority to have a hearing day during the Judiciary Committee’s undertaking of the impeachment inquiry.

DeGette shot Scalise down, arguing the issue was a matter of debate rather than a proper point of order.

The efforts were not unexpected. Procedural criticisms have emerged as a main weapon for Republicans throughout the process — a tactic prominently on display during the House Judiciary Committee’s drawn-out impeachment hearings.

Dear Reader,

When we asked recently what makes TPM different from other outlets, readers cited factors like honesty, curiosity, transparency, and our vibrant community. They also pointed to our ability to report on important stories and trends long before they are picked up by mainstream outlets; our ability to contextualize information within the arc of history; and our focus on the real-world consequences of the news.

Our unique approach to reporting and presenting the news, however, wouldn’t be possible without our readers’ support. That’s not just marketing speak, it’s true: our work would literally not be possible without readers deciding to become members. Not only does member support account for more than 80% of TPM’s revenue, our members have helped us build an engaged and informed community. Many of our best stories were born from reader tips and valuable member feedback.

We do what other news outlets can’t or won’t do because our members’ support gives us real independence.

If you enjoy reading TPM and value what we do, become a member today.

Sincerely,
TPM Staff
Latest News
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Investigations Desk:
Reporters:
Newswriters:
Director of Audience:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: