Trump Loyalists Take On Britney Spears Conservatorship Battle As Part Of GOP Culture Wars

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 09: Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) (L) confers with Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) during a break in testimony by Democratic and Republican counsels during an impeachment hearing before the House Judiciary ... WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 09: Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) (L) confers with Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) during a break in testimony by Democratic and Republican counsels during an impeachment hearing before the House Judiciary Committee in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill December 9, 2019 in Washington, DC. The hearing is being held for the Judiciary Committee to formally receive evidence in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump, whom Democrats say held back military aid for Ukraine while demanding they investigate his political rivals. The White House declared it would not participate in the hearing. (Photo by Jonathan Ernst-Pool/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

After their efforts to overturn the 2020 election in support of former President Trump failed, Reps. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Matt Gaetz (R-FL) are now pivoting to a new battle in the culture wars, getting in on the fight over the legal guardianship of pop icon Britney Spears.

In a letter sent to House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler (D-NY) on Monday, Jordan and Gaetz called for a hearing on conservatorships, referencing the pop superstar’s involuntary conservatorship enacted 13 year ago. Spears’ father, Jamie Spears, was granted the authority by courts to manage the celebrity’s daily and financial affairs ever since then.

“Given the constitutional freedom at stake and opaqueness of these arrangements, it is incumbent upon our Committee to convene a hearing to examine whether Americans are trapped unjustly in conservatorships,” Gaetz and Jordan wrote.

The legal battle over Spears’ conservatorship, which initially began as a temporary order when the Grammy-winning singer was hospitalized for mental health issues in 2008, recently rose to prominence upon the New York Times release of a documentary examining Spears’ tumultuous court battle for the control of her estate. The documentary followed Spears’ fan-led movement known as “Free Britney.”

In arguing their concerns over “the use of conservatorships to effectively deprive individuals of personal freedoms at the behest of others” through courts, Gaetz and Jordan wrote that Spears’ conservatorship troubles speak to issues surrounding guardianship for older people and those with disabilities, which the ACLU has spoken out against.

On Tuesday, Gaetz took to Fox News to say that he believes Spears would be a “great witness” at the hearing that he and Jordan are calling for.

Gaetz and Jordan’s letter comes amid Democrats accusing House Republicans of trying to get more airtime as a way to home in on their status as Trump loyalists, especially in the aftermath of the deadly Capitol insurrection earlier this year that the former president incited. Gaetz and Jordan both voted to reject the Electoral College victory of President Joe Biden even after the deadly violence on the Hill.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Britney, honey, when you have Gym Jordan and Milkshake Gaetz riding to your rescue, you’ve gone 45 floors below the bottom of the barrel.

  2. TPM, you could have given us a photo of britney, but no, you had to go with one of the brothers immaplotzoff.

  3. After their efforts to overturn the 2020 election in support of former President Trump failed, Reps. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Matt Gaetz (R-FL) are now pivoting to a new battle in the culture wars, getting in on the fight over the legal guardianship of pop icon Britney Spears.

    Whatsa matter, fellas? The Dr. Seuss thing not getting any traction?

  4. The courts are already very selective in granting guardianship to another party. Unless the individual really needs someone to have that kind of decision making power, it usually isn’t granted. It’s a lot easier to be made power of attorney for medical and financial matters, so there isn’t a lot of reason to need to be a guardian to take advantage of someone. I know nothing about Britney Spears’ situation, but the laws around this, at least in MD, are pretty much on the individual’s side if they are able to do much of anything for themselves.

  5. Todays young people don’t know who Dr. Seuss is, and they probably don’t know who Britney Spears is either, she was famous like last millennium, before my daughters were even born, it’s been al tabloid crap since then.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

89 more replies

Participants

Avatar for daled Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for fgs Avatar for zandru Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for cervantes Avatar for inversion Avatar for arrendis Avatar for lastroth Avatar for ifeveroheverawiztherewas Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for zd123 Avatar for 21zna9 Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for jtx Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for nonsequitur Avatar for brian512 Avatar for maximus Avatar for rascal_crone Avatar for LeeHarveyGriswold Avatar for Jawbreaker258 Avatar for iafixture Avatar for Ethics_Gradient

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: