FL House Votes To Require Ex-Felons Pay Back Huge Fees Before Re-Enfranchisement

ORLANDO, UNITED STATES-JANUARY 08: Desmond Meade, right, is accompanied by his daughter, Xcellence Meade, center, and his wife, Sheena Meade, inside the Orange County Supervisor of Elections office as he registers to... ORLANDO, UNITED STATES-JANUARY 08: Desmond Meade, right, is accompanied by his daughter, Xcellence Meade, center, and his wife, Sheena Meade, inside the Orange County Supervisor of Elections office as he registers to vote after ex-felons regained their voting rights in the state Tuesday, Jan. 8, 2019, in Orlando, Florida. (Photo by Phelan M. Ebenhack for The Washington Post via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Florida House of Representatives on Wednesday passed a resolution to require former felons to pay potentially thousands of dollars in fines, fees, court costs and restitution (even restitution converted to a civil lien) in order to be allowed to vote, placing a huge asterisk on Amendment 4, the widely supported constitutional change that gives most felons their voting rights back after they “complete all terms of their sentence.”

The House version of Amendment 4 implementation is not yet law; the state Senate, which is also Republican-controlled, is considering a version that would still require the repayment of restitution, but not restitution converted to a civil lien, nor other expenses like fees, fines and court costs, the Orlando Sentinel noted Wednesday. The House version passed along party lines.

Many argue that the amendment text voters overwhelmingly approved was meant to be “self-implementing” or “self-executing” and therefore doesn’t require Republican legislative fine print.

In January, WLRN tallied potentially hundreds of millions of dollars that ex-felons would have to pay in order to vote. That would also be a boon for private debt collection agencies, the report noted, which some counties allow to tack on huge fees on top of the existing debts.

Florida has some of the most burdensome conviction-related expenses in the county, and advocates for felon re-enfranchisement have compared making the right to vote conditional upon paying them back to a modern poll tax.

“It’s blatantly unconstitutional as a poll tax,” Rep. Adam Hattersley (D-Riverview) said in March.

In addition to the discrepancy over fees, the Senate’s version also more narrowly defines which former felons would not be re-enfranchised due to the nature of their convictions: Amendment 4 excludes people “convicted of murder or a felony sexual offense.” The House version would include every felony sexual offense currently on the books, while the Senate’s version is more limited.

The legislative session ends May 3. Amendment 4 got more votes than any statewide elected official, including Sen. Rick Scott (R) and Gov. Ron DeSantis, in the 2018 elections. It replaced Florida’s comically arbitrary status quo for rights restoration.

Latest News

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for grack grack says:

    No thanks. I prefer fucking Democrats.

  2. Avatar for gr gr says:

    Yes, a poll tax. That should go over big in court.

  3. Avatar for sandi sandi says:

    Poll tax.

  4. A felon that has served their time is barred from voting if he can’t come up with a few hundred dollars in fees. But a deadbeat dad that owes the state thousands in arrears child support payments can vote.

    Seems legit.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

50 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for sandi Avatar for robg Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for marincousa Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for irasdad Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for callmeeric Avatar for christianhankel Avatar for tacoma Avatar for gr Avatar for musgrove Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for darrtown Avatar for grack Avatar for katscherger Avatar for georgial1beral Avatar for moonmac Avatar for atldrew Avatar for cmaurand

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: